Jump to content
one...two...tree

John Baer: Obama could actually win this thing (the Pa. primary)

 Share

5 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Country: Philippines
Timeline

By John Baer

Philadelphia Daily News

Daily News Political Columnist

BARACK OBAMA had a pretty good week in Pennsylvania.

In a state that pollsters and analysts call tailor-made for Hillary Clinton, Obama is seriously challenging the fit.

So much so, some wonder if an unraveling's in the offing.

One could make a case.

The average of multiple new polls, including one putting him slightly ahead, shows he has trimmed a large Clinton lead - 20 points in January, 16 last month - down to single digits, at 5.4.

His campaign yesterday announced that it raised $40 million in March amid persistent chatter that Hillary's running low and reports that she raised just half that.

More money means more TV, and Obama's clearly clubbing Clinton.

Last week alone, he spent $2.2 million on Pa. TV ads, compared with her $627,000.

Then he waged a ground war.

He crisscrossed the state on a bus tour with stops in places that should be hers or the GOP's.

In the process, he picked up six days of free and almost entirely positive press.

He went to blue-collar Johnstown, home of big-name Hillary backer U.S. Rep. John Murtha.

He went to hardscrabble Scranton, birth and burial place of Hillary's father.

He went to rural Lancaster County, home of the state's most conservative Republican voters.

And even though he didn't eat a cheesesteak in Philly, well, neither did she.

Point is, he's running hard in a state some said he'd write off since it's so, well, Clinton's - older than the national average, whiter than the national average, less educated than the national average and full of Catholics and union members.

It's also a state where much of the Democratic establishment, including Gov. Rendell and Mayor Nutter, endorses Clinton.

Yet her poll numbers fall.

Not that that's unusual.

Before the most recent big-state primaries in Ohio and Texas on March 4, the same thing happened.

Clinton led in Ohio by 26 points in December, 23 in January and 14 in February. She won the state by 10.

In Texas, she was up 16 in mid-February, 6 in early March and won the state by 3.

And this was as bad things happened to Obama: An economic adviser allegedly told Canada that Obama's anti-NAFTA talk was just politics, and Clinton's first "red phone" ad seemed to cost him votes.

But in Pa. (so far), bad things have happened to Clinton.

Just days before Obama's bus tour, Clinton told the Daily News editorial board that she "misspoke" about landing in Bosnia in '96 under sniper fire.

The story went nuclear, costing her some credibility and helping soften aftershocks of Obama's Rev. Wright.

Then, just as Obama's tour was starting, U.S. Sen. Bob Casey Jr. - not a man known for surprises - surprised many by endorsing Obama at precisely the moment to do him the most good.

It allowed Obama to reach out to Pa. blue-collar, socially conservative Democrats while carrying the seal of approval from a brand-name pol whose core constituency is key to victory and the same one Obama seeks.

Finally, the usually somnambulant Pa. electorate is interested.

New voter-registration figures show a record four million-plus Democrats, including more than 234,000 new Democrats, more than half of whom switched parties to vote on April 22.

This is clearly a plus for Obama. He, not she, brings in new people.

Who knows what happens next week or the week after? Elections, as I've written, often depend on what windows open or close and when.

A misstep or disclosure at a critical time can make all the difference.

All I'm saying is that Obama had a pretty good week - good enough to wonder whether he wins Pa. *

Send e-mail to baerj@phillynews.com.

For recent columns, go to

http://go.philly.com/baer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline

Of course he could win..... Billary is a useless #######. Surely there aren't THAT many people who are too stupid to see that.

Lady, people aren't chocolates. Do you know what they are mostly? Bastards. ####### coated bastards with ####### filling. But I don't find them half as annoying as I find naive bobble-headed optimists who walk around vomiting sunshine.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course he could win..... Billary is a useless #######. Surely there aren't THAT many people who are too stupid to see that.

I sure missed you man! Pull no punches!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course he could win..... Billary is a useless #######. Surely there aren't THAT many people who are too stupid to see that.

:thumbs:

I-130 Timeline with USCIS:

It took 92 days for I-130 to get approved from the filing date

NVC Process of I-130:

It took 78 days to complete the NVC process

Interview Process at The U.S. Embassy

Interview took 223 days from the I-130 filing date. Immigrant Visa was issued right after the interview

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...