Hillary's march to the nomination continues uninterrupted - latest poll has her leading by 3 points in Indiana!!

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

In Indiana, according to Research 2000:

Hillary leads 49-46 among everyone polled.

Obama leads 50-43 among men.

Hillary leads 54-43 among women.

Hillary leads 55-40 among white voters.

Obama leads 81-16 among black voters.

Obama leads 63-36 among voters ages 18 to 29.

Hillary leads 51-45 among voters ages 30 to 44.

Hillary leads 49-43 among voters ages 45 to 59.

Hillary leads 60-34 among voters ages 60+.

...

This poll was conducted the South Bend Tribune, WSBT-TV, WISH-TV and WANE-TV by Research 2000 from March 31 through April 2, 2008. There were a total of 400 likely Democratic Primary voters interviewed statewide by telephone. The margin for error is 5%.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/docs/In408rel.html

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

Three point leads ain't gonna do the trick for her.

[Dan J 277]

I thought she was leading by something like 10 points a week ago?

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

Three point leads ain't gonna do the trick for her.

I disagree.

This is what Hillary's Communications Director (Howard Wolfson) had to say about Pennsylvania. I don't think I have to make the case that Wolfson is a very smart guy and has been right on everything he has said in this campaign so far. His words apply to Indiana just as well.

Clearly, his streak of prescience continues.

Here's what he said about PA today:

"I believe that a win is a win .. Senator Obama ought to be able to win. If they fail to win there, they will have failed in Pennsylvania."

A win is a win. You hear that!

Edited April 4, 2008 by VJ Troll

[simple_male 1]

I thought she was leading by something like 10 points a week ago?

Obama was leading in all polls for NH primary, but Clinton won.

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

I thought she was leading by something like 10 points a week ago?

Obama was leading in all polls for NH primary, but Clinton won.

Like I said - uninterrupted march!

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

Three point leads ain't gonna do the trick for her.

I disagree.

This is what Hillary's Communications Director (Howard Wolfson) had to say about Pennsylvania. I don't think I have to make the case that Wolfson is a very smart guy and has been right on everything he has said in this campaign so far. His words apply to Indiana just as well.

Clearly, his streak of prescience continues.

Here's what he said about PA today:

"I believe that a win is a win .. Senator Obama ought to be able to win. If they fail to win there, they will have failed in Pennsylvania."

A win is a win. You hear that!

A win is a win. Sure. Popular vote and delegates. Those are the parameters. With narrow leads like this, she's not even going to get close to winning. Obama will stand there - righfully - claiming to have won on June 3.

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

Three point leads ain't gonna do the trick for her.

I disagree.

This is what Hillary's Communications Director (Howard Wolfson) had to say about Pennsylvania. I don't think I have to make the case that Wolfson is a very smart guy and has been right on everything he has said in this campaign so far. His words apply to Indiana just as well.

Clearly, his streak of prescience continues.

Here's what he said about PA today:

"I believe that a win is a win .. Senator Obama ought to be able to win. If they fail to win there, they will have failed in Pennsylvania."

A win is a win. You hear that!

A win is a win. Sure. Popular vote and delegates. Those are the parameters. With narrow leads like this, she's not even going to get close to winning. Obama will stand there - righfully - claiming to have won on June 3.

If Hillary wins Pennsylvania, the nomination will rightfully belong to her.

If Obama wins the nomination based on delegates and votes won in insignificant states, then Hillary will be fully justified in waging civil disobedience at the convention! Justice will be done!

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

Three point leads ain't gonna do the trick for her.

I disagree.

This is what Hillary's Communications Director (Howard Wolfson) had to say about Pennsylvania. I don't think I have to make the case that Wolfson is a very smart guy and has been right on everything he has said in this campaign so far. His words apply to Indiana just as well.

Clearly, his streak of prescience continues.

Here's what he said about PA today:

"I believe that a win is a win .. Senator Obama ought to be able to win. If they fail to win there, they will have failed in Pennsylvania."

A win is a win. You hear that!

A win is a win. Sure. Popular vote and delegates. Those are the parameters. With narrow leads like this, she's not even going to get close to winning. Obama will stand there - righfully - claiming to have won on June 3.

If Hillary wins Pennsylvania, the nomination will rightfully belong to her.

If Obama wins the nomination based on delegates and votes won in insignificant states, then Hillary will be fully justified in waging civil disobedience at the convention! Justice will be done!

I want some of what you're smoking today.

[simple_male 1]

Three point leads ain't gonna do the trick for her.

I disagree.

This is what Hillary's Communications Director (Howard Wolfson) had to say about Pennsylvania. I don't think I have to make the case that Wolfson is a very smart guy and has been right on everything he has said in this campaign so far. His words apply to Indiana just as well.

Clearly, his streak of prescience continues.

Here's what he said about PA today:

"I believe that a win is a win .. Senator Obama ought to be able to win. If they fail to win there, they will have failed in Pennsylvania."

A win is a win. You hear that!

A win is a win. Sure. Popular vote and delegates. Those are the parameters. With narrow leads like this, she's not even going to get close to winning. Obama will stand there - righfully - claiming to have won on June 3.

If Hillary wins Pennsylvania, the nomination will rightfully belong to her.

If Obama wins the nomination based on delegates and votes won in insignificant states, then Hillary will be fully justified in waging civil disobedience at the convention! Justice will be done!

Hillary has to win big time in PA. Even if she wins all remaining primaries, she won't be able to erase Barack's popular votes, pledged delegates lead. I am sure, super delegates will not support Hillary blindly while ignoring the important factors (Obama's lead in popular votes, pledged delegates).

[Dan J 277]

Three point leads ain't gonna do the trick for her.

I disagree.

This is what Hillary's Communications Director (Howard Wolfson) had to say about Pennsylvania. I don't think I have to make the case that Wolfson is a very smart guy and has been right on everything he has said in this campaign so far. His words apply to Indiana just as well.

Clearly, his streak of prescience continues.

Here's what he said about PA today:

"I believe that a win is a win .. Senator Obama ought to be able to win. If they fail to win there, they will have failed in Pennsylvania."

A win is a win. You hear that!

A win is a win. Sure. Popular vote and delegates. Those are the parameters. With narrow leads like this, she's not even going to get close to winning. Obama will stand there - righfully - claiming to have won on June 3.

If Hillary wins Pennsylvania, the nomination will rightfully belong to her.

If Obama wins the nomination based on delegates and votes won in insignificant states, then Hillary will be fully justified in waging civil disobedience at the convention! Justice will be done!

Hillary has to win big time in PA. Even if she wins all remaining primaries, she won't be able to erase Barack's popular votes, pledged delegates lead. I am sure, super delegates will not support Hillary blindly while ignoring the important factors (Obama's lead in popular votes, pledged delegates).

A couple of her backers are saying she must win the popular vote to get the nomination: http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/...n-popular-vote/

[one...two...tree 2,762]

I thought she was leading by something like 10 points a week ago?

I thought it was more also. Maybe this is her come-from-behind, Rocky strategy?

[metta 0]

I thought she was leading by something like 10 points a week ago?

I thought it was more also. Maybe this is her come-from-behind, Rocky strategy?

here's POLL: Muhlenberg Pennsylvania Dems

Muhlenberg College

Pennsylvania

Clinton 51, Obama 41

[Alex+R 0]

Heh. I was watching this video today of kids in the South Bronx talk about how Obama is inspiring them and making them believe they can be something. Gonna suck watching their dreams deflate when the political machine wins.

[one...two...tree 2,762]

Heh. I was watching this video today of kids in the South Bronx talk about how Obama is inspiring them and making them believe they can be something. Gonna suck watching their dreams deflate when the political machine wins.

...but it won't not be all for not....Hillary will choose Obama as her VP, and we'll all shakes hands and laugh and cheer.