Disabling Signatures Per-user

[Marilyn. 340]

i have a skipping penguin.. is that ok, mags??

[Jeraly 4]

I suppose the difficulty in getting the background colour right for signatures comes from alternating posts having a very subtly different shade of colour.

Haha - you know I never noticed that either!!! It's ok - I think I will just trim my siggie when I get past K-1 anyway

[StillThePrettiest 3]

can you make the image a gif and give it a transparent background? my fiance did that with my funky South Park avatar in my other forum, so it always matches

[KimandRuss 0]

Yes, you could do that. Create a new photoshop doc with a transparent background and just use the text tool for your timeline and/or drag images into it. If you have CS you can use the magic/background eraser tool to get rid of image backgrounds.

[Jeraly 4]

Oh kewlies - I might have to play with that And if I save as a PSD file as well then I can edit it reasonably easier!! So much else to do first though!!

[Krikit 1,164]

I am getting rid of my signature.

i've never noticed if you had one or not, i've had signatures turned off for over a year

Hmmm. *pieces of a plan start formulating in mind* So, in theory..... we could all put little Charles comments in our sigs and he'd be none the wiser.

[sj5 4]

some of signatures here its fun to look at. i'm not really bothered. Edited April 17, 2008 by SJ

[*julez* 124]

I really think this idea should be readdressed and given some serious consideration. There have been some recent events on the boards here where obnoxious signatures are commented on and the responses from the offenders are rude and inappropriate. They'll even make their sig pics even more obnoxious. I like some sigs, but would greatly appreciate being able to turn off user sigs as needed, rather than miss out on all sigs.

Ewok - is this possible and will you please give this idea some serious consideration?

[Fandango 1,439]

...or at least put a limit to how fricken ginormous some of the sigs can be...

[*julez* 124]

...or at least put a limit to how fricken ginormous some of the sigs can be...

and how bright, blinkie and flashy....

[Krikit 1,164]

Let's make them pass a test first, too.

[wowswift 3]

...or at least put a limit to how fricken ginormous some of the sigs can be...

i agree with this. some of them have giant pictures, its a bit ridiculous, should be a limit on the size of a pic and number of pics.

[Dr. Obvious 49]

I'm sorry about any offense I have caused to the cat mafia. But it's very hard to look like I'm working when there's a bit picture of a cat or a kissing couple on my screen.

[Zee Bee 61]

I really think this idea should be readdressed and given some serious consideration. There have been some recent events on the boards here where obnoxious signatures are commented on and the responses from the offenders are rude and inappropriate. They'll even make their sig pics even more obnoxious. I like some sigs, but would greatly appreciate being able to turn off user sigs as needed, rather than miss out on all sigs.

Ewok - is this possible and will you please give this idea some serious consideration?

Thanks for bumping this Julez. Something needs to be done.

[Sinergy 3]

...or at least put a limit to how fricken ginormous some of the sigs can be...

Agreed, there are some siggies where the person has a photoalbum of pics, and its not just one or 2 but tons. i have things in my siggie, but i dont or hope they are not annoying and bla. i tried not to be flashy or too sparkly

Limit the siggie pic usage.

Edited June 5, 2008 by Sinergy