Jump to content

3 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted

Last week, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi told reporters that she believed the presidential candidate with the most pledged delegates should be the Democratic nominee. Pelosi added that the party would likely be damaged if “superdelegates overturn what happened in the elections.”

It was noteworthy, in part because Pelosi has remained neutral in the Clinton-Obama competition, but the Speaker’s opinion was hardly shocking — most Dems seem to believe the candidate who does the best in the nation’s primaries and caucuses should get the party’s nod.

But that didn’t stop 20 high-dollar Clinton donors from getting together to push back rather aggressively against the Speaker’s remarks.

Angered that Pelosi wants Democratic insiders to follow the will of voters when they cast their own “superdelegate” votes in the nomination race, 20 of Clinton’s top fund-raisers issued a veiled threat to Pelosi and warned her to change her tune.

“We have been strong supporters of the [Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee],” they wrote, referring to the House fund-raising arm overseen by Pelosi. “We therefore urge you to clarify your position on superdelegates and reflect in your comments a more open view.”

Sources said Pelosi was infuriated by the implied threat the donors would quit giving cash to the committee.

Greg Sargent obtained and posted the letter in its entirety.

Pelosi, apparently, was unmoved by the tactic, and according to her spokesperson, continues to believe that superdelegates should respect “the decisions of millions of Americans who have voted.”

But the implications of such a letter being sent in the first place are worth considering.

http://www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com/

Posted
Not entirely suprising. There are some who want to see Clinton as President no matter what it takes. But then its not really thier choice anyway.

They are making it easy for John McCain to win.

I-130 Timeline with USCIS:

It took 92 days for I-130 to get approved from the filing date

NVC Process of I-130:

It took 78 days to complete the NVC process

Interview Process at The U.S. Embassy

Interview took 223 days from the I-130 filing date. Immigrant Visa was issued right after the interview

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...