Illegal Immigrants in the US - where are they, where did they come from, what do they do? An interactive tool from CNN.COM

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

http://www.cnn.com/interactive/us/0603/cha...et.exclude.html

[Ban Hammer 13,669]

and the numbers keep going up and up. interesting graph

[Sinergy 3]

[pax 0]

BULL S H I T.

They didn't even check their own source--which, according to the graph, was the Pew Hispanic Center. Here's the report I posted earlier.

http://pewhispanic.org/files/factsheets/16.pdf

[peejay 327]

These graphs fail to take into account the 7 amnesties that our government has bestowed on people that continue to be drawn by the reward of amnesty for illegally immigrating. As these amnesties have been handed out...the illegal immigration continues at an accelerated pace. It hasn't gone down.

http://www.numbersusa.com/interests/amnesty.html

So why do we continue to see HR4437 protested by the illegals...because it would put an end to this sick joke. The only ones that want the status quo to continue is the illegals, the ethnic identity crowd, unscrupulous employers, and anyone else that makes $$$ out of this sham at the expense of the majority of Americans.

Amnesty is the least desirable option. It has a proven track record of absolute failure. But there are always morons that believe if you keep doing the same failed policies repeatedly that the result will be different. And there are those that already know that amnesty will be a failure, but support it to keep the status quo.

Most Americans know better. It's time for a change...HR4437. Enforce the law first and foremost. Cut them off from illegal work and there will be no need for mass deportations. They will go somewhere else to work (back home).

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

Amnesty is the least desirable option. It has a proven track record of absolute failure. But there are always morons that believe if you keep doing the same failed policies repeatedly that the result will be different. And there are those that already know that amnesty will be a failure, but support it to keep the status quo.

I think there's more of the latter when you look at the people in Congress and more of the former when you look at the folk that put them there. It's madness...