Obama to be on Olbermann at 8pm tonight to address the Rev. Wright issue

[HAL 9000 96]

I doubt a cabbie would pass up Oprah though

[SnowyTater 0]

I did enjoy the "It's kind of like your crazy drunk senile uncle that you gotta love and pat on the back anyway..." statements, though I'm exaggerating in a pretty irresponsible way yeh

I caught him on Fox with Hannity and Colmes awhile ago, and it was also the first time I'd seen/heard any of the clips of what the Pastor's been saying. I didn't really...care, gosh xD Even with the "G*D America stuff", was still just like...yeh maybe he's just having a bad day

I thought Obama did a pretty good job in his denouncement and his response to their questions. Looked to me he was just like "dang it I'm on Fox sigh I'm hungry", completely reasonable answers though. Coming from someone that doesn't pay nearly enough attention and doesn't 'get' a lot of politics, this doesn't really affect my opinion of Obama at all.

It's a bit disturbing how it seems like everyone keeps trying to tie the poor guy to like...terrorism or something

[HAL 9000 96]

"dang it I'm on Fox sigh I'm hungry"

Actually some people I've spoken to usually have the other end active when Faux comes on. But the gist is that this silly grouping of third-rate journalists really just begs most rational people to find better things to do with their time.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

I don't like this at all. I was hoping Obama would get the nomination and then go down in flames later, not NOW!

I doubt his campaign will implode over this.

We might as well wheel some of the skeletons out of John McCain's closet. Including:

1) His "######" statement.

2) How he voted against making MLK day a federal holiday in 1983

3) How he hired Richard Quinn to be his spokesperson in South Carolina - a guy who has written articles stating that Nelson Mandela is "a terrorist" and who wrote “What better way to reject politics as usual than to elect a maverick like David Duke?”

4) How he campaigned for George Wallace's son in Alabama.

5) How he flipped flopped in his comments on the Confederate Flag.

I mean these are pretty much all things that McCain has actually said and done, right? As opposed to the nudge-nudge-wink-wink against Obama.

Hell if this kind of stuff can't sink McCain's campaign - is a church affiliation going to do that for Obama?

Hard to say - but what seems clear is that its easy to find dirt on any candidate you care to name, and make mountains out of molehills.

[kaydee457 13]

Well, finally this charlatan is being scrutinized! If anyone covers this story fairly it'll be FOX news.

MSNBC and CNN have long had a man crush on Obama.

They're so biased in his favor it should be a crime!

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Well, finally this charlatan is being scrutinized! If anyone covers this story fairly it'll be FOX news.

MSNBC and CNN have long had a man crush on Obama.

They're so biased in his favor it should be a crime!

Really

Something you'd care to substantiate no doubt?

Nah - probably not.

[kaydee457 13]

Well, finally this charlatan is being scrutinized! If anyone covers this story fairly it'll be FOX news.

MSNBC and CNN have long had a man crush on Obama.

They're so biased in his favor it should be a crime!

Really

Something you'd care to substantiate no doubt?

Nah - probably not.

The proof's there if you care to find the truth....probably not!

Here, I'll help you out. Just recently there was a media watchgroup, can't remember what they are clled, but comprised of media people themselves that evaluate the truthfulness, and bias of the news, and they specifically chimed in on the coverage of the candidates by cable news operators.

Fox was number one in fairness and unbiased coverage. CNN number two, and MSNBC number three.

If you wish to spend your Saturday afternoon to research this then go for it.

[HAL 9000 96]

LOL... an independent media watchgroup, "no doubt..."

[kaydee457 13]

LOL... an independent media watchgroup, "no doubt..."

LOL back at you....No, it was an industry wathdog group!

[HAL 9000 96]

Again, the burden of proof is on you

Industry, no industry, media, etc. Where's the beef?

I think the key word for you to prove is independent... not that you'd be expected to follow through.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Well, finally this charlatan is being scrutinized! If anyone covers this story fairly it'll be FOX news.

MSNBC and CNN have long had a man crush on Obama.

They're so biased in his favor it should be a crime!

Really

Something you'd care to substantiate no doubt?

Nah - probably not.

The proof's there if you care to find the truth....probably not!

Here, I'll help you out. Just recently there was a media watchgroup, can't remember what they are clled, but comprised of media people themselves that evaluate the truthfulness, and bias of the news, and they specifically chimed in on the coverage of the candidates by cable news operators.

Fox was number one in fairness and unbiased coverage. CNN number two, and MSNBC number three.

If you wish to spend your Saturday afternoon to research this then go for it.

Truthiness eh?

I think we're all a bit old for "Once upon a time..." stories.

Its just amazing to me that you trot out these statements but you personally don't offer anything to back them up - even *if* it were true.

Basically what you offer comes down to: "Well there was this guy once, on this thing on TV who said some stuff about some people".

[kaydee457 13]

Well, finally this charlatan is being scrutinized! If anyone covers this story fairly it'll be FOX news.

MSNBC and CNN have long had a man crush on Obama.

They're so biased in his favor it should be a crime!

Really

Something you'd care to substantiate no doubt?

Nah - probably not.

The proof's there if you care to find the truth....probably not!

Here, I'll help you out. Just recently there was a media watchgroup, can't remember what they are clled, but comprised of media people themselves that evaluate the truthfulness, and bias of the news, and they specifically chimed in on the coverage of the candidates by cable news operators.

Fox was number one in fairness and unbiased coverage. CNN number two, and MSNBC number three.

If you wish to spend your Saturday afternoon to research this then go for it.

Truthiness eh?

I think we're all a bit old for "Once upon a time..." stories.

Its just amazing to me that you trot out these statements but you personally don't offer anything to back them up - even *if* it were true.

Basically what you offer comes down to: "Well there was this guy once, on this thing on TV who said some stuff about some people".

LOL...I rarely if ever don't supply a reference......Like I said, you waste your time this afternoon researching this, if of course the truth matters to you, which we've learned oftentimes doesn't.

Enjoy.

[HAL 9000 96]

We can continue to wait.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Well, finally this charlatan is being scrutinized! If anyone covers this story fairly it'll be FOX news.

MSNBC and CNN have long had a man crush on Obama.

They're so biased in his favor it should be a crime!

Really

Something you'd care to substantiate no doubt?

Nah - probably not.

The proof's there if you care to find the truth....probably not!

Here, I'll help you out. Just recently there was a media watchgroup, can't remember what they are clled, but comprised of media people themselves that evaluate the truthfulness, and bias of the news, and they specifically chimed in on the coverage of the candidates by cable news operators.

Fox was number one in fairness and unbiased coverage. CNN number two, and MSNBC number three.

If you wish to spend your Saturday afternoon to research this then go for it.

Truthiness eh?

I think we're all a bit old for "Once upon a time..." stories.

Its just amazing to me that you trot out these statements but you personally don't offer anything to back them up - even *if* it were true.

Basically what you offer comes down to: "Well there was this guy once, on this thing on TV who said some stuff about some people".

LOL...I rarely if ever don't supply a reference......Like I said, you waste your time this afternoon researching this, if of course the truth matters to you, which we've learned oftentimes doesn't.

Enjoy.

I think we've also learned that (once again), the manure salesman is loathe to stand behind his own product.

[kaydee457 13]

Well, finally this charlatan is being scrutinized! If anyone covers this story fairly it'll be FOX news.

MSNBC and CNN have long had a man crush on Obama.

They're so biased in his favor it should be a crime!

Really

Something you'd care to substantiate no doubt?

Nah - probably not.

The proof's there if you care to find the truth....probably not!

Here, I'll help you out. Just recently there was a media watchgroup, can't remember what they are clled, but comprised of media people themselves that evaluate the truthfulness, and bias of the news, and they specifically chimed in on the coverage of the candidates by cable news operators.

Fox was number one in fairness and unbiased coverage. CNN number two, and MSNBC number three.

If you wish to spend your Saturday afternoon to research this then go for it.

Truthiness eh?

I think we're all a bit old for "Once upon a time..." stories.

Its just amazing to me that you trot out these statements but you personally don't offer anything to back them up - even *if* it were true.

Basically what you offer comes down to: "Well there was this guy once, on this thing on TV who said some stuff about some people".

LOL...I rarely if ever don't supply a reference......Like I said, you waste your time this afternoon researching this, if of course the truth matters to you, which we've learned oftentimes doesn't.

Enjoy.

I think we've also learned that (once again), the manure salesman is loathe to stand behind his own product.

Nope, all this demonstrates is that the town idjit stoops to personal attacks to delude himself that he's somehow come out on top of an argument.....

Here's a novel idea for you Number, disprove what I said, unless of course you're calling me a liar. Are you calling me a liar, Number?

Are you saying that I'm a liar? I want to get this straight, Number....

Please elaborate.

Edited March 16, 2008 by kaydee457