Tourist Visa

[rebeccajo 14]

Now, Mrs. Billy Bong -

When your husband entered on the VWP, how did he answer the questions on the I94W regarding prior convictions for use of a controlled substance?

[DA BOMB 1]

Eric and Theresa - Just for the record, having a K1 petition in place doesn't make one ineligible to use the VWP.

You are right, but what about using the VWP with the intention of marrying and applying for AOS? Is that allowed? I thought you could use the VWP to visit the U.S. strictly for tourism and bussiness.

We had a visa petition in process - he came over for the birth of our son with INTENTIONS of returning - there was no preconcieved intention.

[DA BOMB 1]

Now, Mrs. Billy Bong -

When your husband entered on the VWP, how did he answer the questions on the I94W regarding prior convictions for use of a controlled substance?

• Make comments in a Post either direct or implied toward another member that are purposely designed to upset, antagonize, make fun of, belittle, or otherwise instigate an argument that takes away from the personal enjoyment of the Service by other users.

Again - you're venturing into an area that violates TOS and is totally screwin with my personal enjoyment of the Service. My original post you "reposted" in the correct forum summed up about as much as you and the other members need to know about our United States Immigration case - why then do you post this antagonizing question about a confidential case?

[rebeccajo 14]

Now, Mrs. Billy Bong -

When your husband entered on the VWP, how did he answer the questions on the I94W regarding prior convictions for use of a controlled substance?

• Make comments in a Post either direct or implied toward another member that are purposely designed to upset, antagonize, make fun of, belittle, or otherwise instigate an argument that takes away from the personal enjoyment of the Service by other users.

Again - you're venturing into an area that violates TOS and is totally screwin with my personal enjoyment of the Service. My original post you "reposted" in the correct forum summed up about as much as you and the other members need to know about our United States Immigration case - why then do you post this antagonizing question about a confidential case?

That makes no sense.

You are the one who brought it up.

[DA BOMB 1]

Now, Mrs. Billy Bong -

When your husband entered on the VWP, how did he answer the questions on the I94W regarding prior convictions for use of a controlled substance?

• Make comments in a Post either direct or implied toward another member that are purposely designed to upset, antagonize, make fun of, belittle, or otherwise instigate an argument that takes away from the personal enjoyment of the Service by other users.

Again - you're venturing into an area that violates TOS and is totally screwin with my personal enjoyment of the Service. My original post you "reposted" in the correct forum summed up about as much as you and the other members need to know about our United States Immigration case - why then do you post this antagonizing question about a confidential case?

That makes no sense.

You are the one who brought it up.

ok

[rebeccajo 14]

*back to our regularly scheduled programming as it's clear the resurrection of this thread is only about attention whoring, rather than a forthright discussion of the issues*

Edited March 22, 2008 by rebeccajo