Jump to content
w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r

Geraldine Ferrarro the racist steps down

 Share

63 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline
Her words speak volumes.

The only people who don't see the racism in her words are those blinded by their own racism.

The only people who think her words were racist are those that think the world owes them a living because of their skin color.

I'm white and I found her remarks racist.

All you need is a modest house in a modest neighborhood

In a modest town where honest people dwell

--July 22---------Sent I-129F packet

--July 27---------Petition received

--August 28------NOA1 issued

--August 31------Arrived in Terrace after lots of flight delays to spend Lindsay's birthday with her

--October 10-----Completed address change online

--January 25-----NOA2 received via USCIS Case Status Online

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Filed: Timeline

(CNN) – Geraldine Ferraro has stepped down from her role as a member of Hillary Clinton's finance committee.

In a letter to Clinton obtained by CNN's Suzanne Malveaux — who spoke with the former vice presidential candidate shortly after she sent it to Clinton — Ferraro said she is stepping down so, "I can speak for myself and you can continue to speak for yourself about what is at stake in this campaign."

In a phone conversation with Malveaux, Ferraro said she was not asked to step down by Senator Clinton or her campaign.

Ferraro said thousands of people are part of the finance committee, saying it is not a staff position, but a voluntary one for those who raise money for the campaign. She also said she has raised $125,000 for Senator Clinton.

When asked if she had any regrets about what she said, Ferraro replied, "absolutely not."

"I am who I am and I will continue to speak up." She added that she thought it was a shame that the Obama campaign was trying to block her First Amendment rights, and that she felt that was no way to conduct a campaign.

She said, "it's not me slicing and dicing," a reference to Obama's comments earlier in the day accusing Ferraro of dividing the party.

Ferraro said David Axelrod, Obama's campaign manager and an acquaintance, should have called her to ask her the intention of her remarks, which she says the Obama campaign used to hurt Clinton.

When asked how she felt about Hillary Clinton distancing herself from her remarks, Ferraro replied, "I am perfectly fine," and that there were no hard feelings. She said she understands what Clinton is going through, and understands that being part of a presidential campaign is "very hard."

(Updated 6 p.m. ET with additional reporting.)

link

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: United Kingdom
Timeline

I wouldn't say she was exactly racist - but her comments certainly were a bit stupid; and (given her experience) she should have known better rather than to inject race into the debate in such a way as to suggest that its a primary motivating factor in Obama's success. I don't think she had any business doing that IMO, nor did she make a point that had any factual (or authoritative) substance.

On one hand she suggested that BO reaching this point in the campaign race is to do with his race and media exposure, is a tad insulting - not only to BO, but to the voters who actually support his candidacy on policy issues.

On the other she undermined herself, and her own qualifications by suggesting that the only reason she was selected as a Vice-presidential candidate was because she is a woman. Does that strike anyone else as a bit weird?

Always blame someone else for opening yer trapper... that's not mature...

She's also overstating the importance, honesty or intelligence of her statements. Statements which were neither important, honest or intelligent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline
I wouldn't say she was exactly racist - but her comments certainly were a bit stupid; and (given her experience) she should have known better rather than to inject race into the debate in such a way as to suggest that its a primary motivating factor in Obama's success. I don't think she had any business doing that IMO, nor did she make a point that had any factual (or authoritative) substance.

On one hand she suggested that BO reaching this point in the campaign race is to do with his race and media exposure, is a tad insulting - not only to BO, but to the voters who actually support his candidacy on policy issues.

On the other she undermined herself, and her own qualifications by suggesting that the only reason she was selected as a Vice-presidential candidate was because she is a woman. Does that strike anyone else as a bit weird?

She interjected the sexism thing as well but no one seems to care about that.....

BO got to where h was by writing a bestseller & later courting the press (after talking to insiders about it all), it's not hard to see that.

Edited by illumine
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Colombia
Timeline
I wouldn't say she was exactly racist - but her comments certainly were a bit stupid; and (given her experience) she should have known better rather than to inject race into the debate in such a way as to suggest that its a primary motivating factor in Obama's success. I don't think she had any business doing that IMO, nor did she make a point that had any factual (or authoritative) substance.

On one hand she suggested that BO reaching this point in the campaign race is to do with his race and media exposure, is a tad insulting - not only to BO, but to the voters who actually support his candidacy on policy issues.

On the other she undermined herself, and her own qualifications by suggesting that the only reason she was selected as a Vice-presidential candidate was because she is a woman. Does that strike anyone else as a bit weird?

Always blame someone else for opening yer trapper... that's not mature...

She's also overstating the importance, honesty or intelligence of her statements. Statements which were neither important, honest or intelligent.

Yes... Someone of so much stature and experience should have known so much better.

Wishing you ten-fold that which you wish upon all others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
I wouldn't say she was exactly racist - but her comments certainly were a bit stupid; and (given her experience) she should have known better rather than to inject race into the debate in such a way as to suggest that its a primary motivating factor in Obama's success. I don't think she had any business doing that IMO, nor did she make a point that had any factual (or authoritative) substance.

On one hand she suggested that BO reaching this point in the campaign race is to do with his race and media exposure, is a tad insulting - not only to BO, but to the voters who actually support his candidacy on policy issues.

On the other she undermined herself, and her own qualifications by suggesting that the only reason she was selected as a Vice-presidential candidate was because she is a woman. Does that strike anyone else as a bit weird?

She interjected the sexism thing as well but no one seems to care about that......

Who doesn't care?

She simply had no business doing what she did. A journalist can comment on these things - but someone who is politically exposed and attached to a campaign really should know better. Race and gender are clearly very sensitive issues in this country. I think that's self-evident without making stupid statements attributing one candidates success to his race.

Race and gender do play a part in voting decisions, but to suggest that one candidate is winning largely, or solely because of that is grotesque overstatement.

Edited by Number 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline
I wouldn't say she was exactly racist - but her comments certainly were a bit stupid; and (given her experience) she should have known better rather than to inject race into the debate in such a way as to suggest that its a primary motivating factor in Obama's success. I don't think she had any business doing that IMO, nor did she make a point that had any factual (or authoritative) substance.

On one hand she suggested that BO reaching this point in the campaign race is to do with his race and media exposure, is a tad insulting - not only to BO, but to the voters who actually support his candidacy on policy issues.

On the other she undermined herself, and her own qualifications by suggesting that the only reason she was selected as a Vice-presidential candidate was because she is a woman. Does that strike anyone else as a bit weird?

She interjected the sexism thing as well but no one seems to care about that......

Who doesn't care?

She simply had no business doing what she did. A journalist can comment on these things - but someone who is politically exposed and attached to a campaign really should know better. Race and gender are clearly very sensitive issues in this country. I think that's self-evident without making stupid statements attributing one candidates success to his race.

Race and gender do play a part in voting decisions, but to suggest that one candidate is winning largely, or solely because of that is grotesque overstatement.

She said he got to where he was because of several reasons & she said the media is sexist but everyone jumped on hey, let's just call her a racist - it's got more drama.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
BO got to where h was by writing a bestseller & later courting the press (after talking to insiders about it all), it's not hard to see that.

That is of course - your opinion. But you are making a vast (unfair IMO) assumption about the people who are supporting BO.

HC has wrote a NYT bestselling book not too long ago as well I believe.. Does she also not court the press?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline
BO got to where h was by writing a bestseller & later courting the press (after talking to insiders about it all), it's not hard to see that.

That is of course - your opinion. But you are making a vast (unfair IMO) assumption about the people who are supporting BO.

HC has wrote a NYT bestselling book not too long ago as well I believe.. Does she also not court the press?

totally different circumstances.

PS: She was also First Lady.

Edited by illumine
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: England
Timeline
Her words speak volumes.

The only people who don't see the racism in her words are those blinded by their own racism.

The only people who think her words were racist are those that think the world owes them a living because of their skin color.

I'm white and I found her remarks racist.

Then I guess I should add and those that think any critical comment about a person of an ethnic minority can only be based on racism and are unable to understand it might be that persons opinion held for other reasons.

If you really think Obama would be where he is today if he was white middle class then you must have lead a very sheltered life.

What to expect at the POE - WIKI entry

IR-1 Timeline IR-1 details in my timeline

N-400 Timeline

2009-08-21 Applied for US Citizenship

2009-08-28 NOA

2009-09-22 Biometrics appointment

2009-12-01 Interview - Approved

2009-12-02 Oath ceremony - now a US Citizen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
I wouldn't say she was exactly racist - but her comments certainly were a bit stupid; and (given her experience) she should have known better rather than to inject race into the debate in such a way as to suggest that its a primary motivating factor in Obama's success. I don't think she had any business doing that IMO, nor did she make a point that had any factual (or authoritative) substance.

On one hand she suggested that BO reaching this point in the campaign race is to do with his race and media exposure, is a tad insulting - not only to BO, but to the voters who actually support his candidacy on policy issues.

On the other she undermined herself, and her own qualifications by suggesting that the only reason she was selected as a Vice-presidential candidate was because she is a woman. Does that strike anyone else as a bit weird?

She interjected the sexism thing as well but no one seems to care about that......

Who doesn't care?

She simply had no business doing what she did. A journalist can comment on these things - but someone who is politically exposed and attached to a campaign really should know better. Race and gender are clearly very sensitive issues in this country. I think that's self-evident without making stupid statements attributing one candidates success to his race.

Race and gender do play a part in voting decisions, but to suggest that one candidate is winning largely, or solely because of that is grotesque overstatement.

She said he got to where he was because of several reasons & she said the media is sexist but everyone jumped on hey, let's just call her a racist - it's got more drama.

I didn't say she was a racist.

She said that if her name had been Gerald, rather than Geraldine that she wouldn't have been nominated.

I am saying that her comments are rather less profound than she's making out. Saying the media is sexist is one thing - does anyone really have any evidence for that?

BO got to where h was by writing a bestseller & later courting the press (after talking to insiders about it all), it's not hard to see that.

That is of course - your opinion. But you are making a vast (unfair IMO) assumption about the people who are supporting BO.

HC has wrote a NYT bestselling book not too long ago as well I believe.. Does she also not court the press?

totally different circumstances.

PS: She was also First Lady.

So what? Is BO really doing something that HC isn't or can't?

Seriously this sounds like nothing more than sour grapes to me. He's winning because... Unfair!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline
I didn't say she was a racist.

She said that if her name had been Gerald, rather than Geraldine that she wouldn't have been nominated.

I am saying that her comments are rather less profound than she's making out. Saying the media is sexist is one thing - does anyone really have any evidence for that?

You didn,t but plenty of VJers have (and O's camp & the media, etc) . And anyone who doesn't disagree with Gerry is as well. Talk about jumping on the bandwagon....

Does anyone have evidence she's racist other then a gut feeling?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
I didn't say she was a racist.

She said that if her name had been Gerald, rather than Geraldine that she wouldn't have been nominated.

I am saying that her comments are rather less profound than she's making out. Saying the media is sexist is one thing - does anyone really have any evidence for that?

You didn,t but plenty of VJers have (and O's camp & the media, etc) . And anyone who doesn't disagree with Gerry is as well. Talk about jumping on the bandwagon....

Does anyone have evidence she's racist other then a gut feeling?

Well there is a difference between saying that she is personally racist, Vs. saying that those particular comments were.

That whole

"Any time anybody does anything that in any way pulls this campaign down and says let's address reality and the problems we're facing in this world, you're accused of being racist, so you have to shut up,". "Racism works in two different directions. I really think they're attacking me because I'm white. How's that?"
line of argument is an old one that has been over-used by right-wing talk-radio commentators and some Republican politicians who are too stupid and stubborn to admit that their comments were, at best, ill-advised. I didn't buy it when they said it - and I don't buy it now she's wheeling it out of the closet. Edited by Number 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...