Spun out

[no name 1]

Cough cough... Bull$hit.

Enquiring minds need to know - the name-calling stops only when you deem it necessary?

No, when you decide to turn down the headlights to something a little more consistent with the very message of issues Hillary just stated. You can't illuminate what you're blinding out.

*in good fun*

and you weren't even a part of this conversation til you had to come by & *flood* me. You can turn your own floodlight off.

Oh... I guess I need permission to include myself in your ever luminous presence... shall I beg permission next time if it makes you more comfortable?

In all seriousness, don't dish out if you can't receive. Must be a golden rule somewhere.

so you post this ####### & send an apologetic PM - and that makes it all OK? Gimme a break.

[HAL 9000 96]

Cough cough... Bull$hit.

Enquiring minds need to know - the name-calling stops only when you deem it necessary?

No, when you decide to turn down the headlights to something a little more consistent with the very message of issues Hillary just stated. You can't illuminate what you're blinding out.

*in good fun*

and you weren't even a part of this conversation til you had to come by & *flood* me. You can turn your own floodlight off.

Oh... I guess I need permission to include myself in your ever luminous presence... shall I beg permission next time if it makes you more comfortable?

In all seriousness, don't dish out if you can't receive. Must be a golden rule somewhere.

so you post this ####### & send an apologetic PM - and that makes it all OK? Gimme a break.

Wow... no logic for you then. But since you want to be petty, care to state what the PM said?

Whine all you want.

[no name 1]

Cough cough... Bull$hit.

Enquiring minds need to know - the name-calling stops only when you deem it necessary?

No, when you decide to turn down the headlights to something a little more consistent with the very message of issues Hillary just stated. You can't illuminate what you're blinding out.

*in good fun*

and you weren't even a part of this conversation til you had to come by & *flood* me. You can turn your own floodlight off.

Oh... I guess I need permission to include myself in your ever luminous presence... shall I beg permission next time if it makes you more comfortable?

In all seriousness, don't dish out if you can't receive. Must be a golden rule somewhere.

so you post this ####### & send an apologetic PM - and that makes it all OK? Gimme a break.

Wow... no logic for you then. But since you want to be petty, care to state what the PM said?

Whine all you want.

You are so back-handed it's ridiculous.

And no, quoting PMs goes against TOS. I'll leave it up to others to guess what that gem said.

[mawilson 2,133]

so you post this ####### & send an apologetic PM - and that makes it all OK? Gimme a break.

He didn't send you any PM, much less an apologetic one.

[HAL 9000 96]

Cough cough... Bull$hit.

Enquiring minds need to know - the name-calling stops only when you deem it necessary?

No, when you decide to turn down the headlights to something a little more consistent with the very message of issues Hillary just stated. You can't illuminate what you're blinding out.

*in good fun*

and you weren't even a part of this conversation til you had to come by & *flood* me. You can turn your own floodlight off.

Oh... I guess I need permission to include myself in your ever luminous presence... shall I beg permission next time if it makes you more comfortable?

In all seriousness, don't dish out if you can't receive. Must be a golden rule somewhere.

so you post this ####### & send an apologetic PM - and that makes it all OK? Gimme a break.

Wow... no logic for you then. But since you want to be petty, care to state what the PM said?

Whine all you want.

You are so back-handed it's ridiculous.

And no, quoting PMs goes against TOS. I'll leave it up to others to guess what that gem said.

Well, I apologized if you felt offended by any of my comments. That's how back-handed and bad-natured I can be. Speculating as to what bug bit you is sincerely none of my concern.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

I read a lot more anti-clinton stuff here than anti-obama. Overall, VJ dems seem very pro-Obama. A few people posting a response to shouldn't be something to get too worked up about.

Its one thing to support a candidate, another to shill for them. Most of the articles that get posted on here (including this one) and frame our political discussions are less the former and more the latter.

[Trompe le Monde 1,107]

I read a lot more anti-clinton stuff here than anti-obama. Overall, VJ dems seem very pro-Obama. A few people posting a response to shouldn't be something to get too worked up about.

Its one thing to support a candidate, another to shill for them. Most of the articles that get posted on here (including this one) and frame our political discussions are less the former and more the latter.

Yes, I agree with that.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Unless I've missed it - there hasn't been a policy discussion in days.

[HAL 9000 96]

Totally right N6... unfortunately that we need a course in political sciences to tell the difference between criticizing something worthy of critique whereas for the most part there seems to be a lot of criticizing a lot of nothing out of who knows what.

Unless I've missed it - there hasn't been a policy discussion in days.

Policy/Issues... another bump for CNN. Turner should have me on payroll...

http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/issues/index.html

[Trompe le Monde 1,107]

Unless I've missed it - there hasn't been a policy discussion in days.

No - it's all who said what and campaign tactics.

[Ban Hammer 13,252]

Cough cough... Bull$hit.

Enquiring minds need to know - the name-calling stops only when you deem it necessary?

No, when you decide to turn down the headlights to something a little more consistent with the very message of issues Hillary just stated. You can't illuminate what you're blinding out.

oh wow dev is shining her headlights around?

[no name 1]

so you post this ####### & send an apologetic PM - and that makes it all OK? Gimme a break.

He didn't send you any PM, much less an apologetic one.

You reading my inbox?

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

source?

My email account. But you can probably find it at Obama's website.

come on, seriously!

I get tons of interesting mail in my inbox but that doesn't make it trustworthy or true.

Dev, I have contributed to Barack's campaign, therefore I get emails from them thanking me, encouraging me to give more and interesting items such as this.

Me too. I got one from Bubba today! but I'm not posting it as 'fact' or as a 'valid' story.

I fear that Bill didn't actually send it *himself*.

Dev, I have to leave work now, but if you want to argue any of the email that you feel is factually wrong, I'll read your responses in the morning.

Here we are, 90+ posts later and not one hint of an argument on any of the points as being factually wrong. Not one. The silence is truly deafening.

[mawilson 2,133]

so you post this ####### & send an apologetic PM - and that makes it all OK? Gimme a break.

He didn't send you any PM, much less an apologetic one.

You reading my inbox?

Only when I'm really really bored.