locked threads

[eric&gen 0]

Is it me or is this site moody as of late I notice locked threads quite a bit. Can't speak your mind without certain mods getting trigger happy with the lock button lol. Of course this one will be locked for coz I say what I feel lol.

[Jasman0717 9]

Its been open for 20 minutes and not locked yet

[William33 110]

Threads are locked for TOS violations, when they are not salvageable or are so old that the mold has mold.

The Mods confer on most threads that are locked. On occasion, threads are immediately locked if gross violations of TOS are identified.

[Captain Ewok 1,891]

Also if the OP requests it be locked. That is just an old standing rule.

[Ban Hammer 13,337]

so eric, ask that this one be locked

[Niels Bohr 72]

LOL. Eric trying to invoke Freedom of Speech on here. Some speech aren't meant to be expressed. For example, throwing tantrums.

[diadromous mermaid 36]

I think that it would be a better move by the mods that when a decision has been made to close a thread, for TOS violations, that the mod be required to cite the actual TOS violation that has occurred, rather than to use a blanket statement, "due to TOS violations". Sometimes it is obvious ~ other times one is left scratching one's head. I must say that I think some threads are locked, without members really knowing why. I also believe that when a choice to lock a thread is made based on the OP not having returned, is a pity. Some people don't have access to VJ as often as others, or they may be traveling and when they come back to view their query it's shut down. After all, this forum is a members forum, and if there is some censorship or moderation that doesn't apply, the members should have a say in how that is being handled and what remedies should be considered.

[PalestineMyHeart 1,897]

In my humble opinion, locking a thread for TOS violations isn't the best way to handle the problem (unless the entire thread is a TOS violation.)

I think it would be a better idea to just delete the offending posts.

[SMOKE 1,426]

In my humble opinion, locking a thread for TOS violations isn't the best way to handle the problem (unless the entire thread is a TOS violation.)

I think it would be a better idea to just delete the offending posts.

the mods are volunteers that'd be a full time job on some days.

[PalestineMyHeart 1,897]

In my humble opinion, locking a thread for TOS violations isn't the best way to handle the problem (unless the entire thread is a TOS violation.)

I think it would be a better idea to just delete the offending posts.

the mods are volunteers that'd be a full time job on some days.

I don't understand why deleting a post would take more time than locking a thread. Can you explain ?

Edited March 8, 2008 by wife_of_mahmoud

[LaL 418]

In my humble opinion, locking a thread for TOS violations isn't the best way to handle the problem (unless the entire thread is a TOS violation.)

I think it would be a better idea to just delete the offending posts.

Actually we tried that course of action in the beginning, however after much discussion how members wanted to have these situations handled, we decided to go with the numerous suggestions to let the record stand. We use a combination when appropriate, however lean more towards locking.

It will never please everyone, but we do try to make the best decisions for the site. Adding if there is ever a question for a mod or a question on their actions, please feel free to PM any of us.

Edited March 8, 2008 by LaL

[PalestineMyHeart 1,897]

In my humble opinion, locking a thread for TOS violations isn't the best way to handle the problem (unless the entire thread is a TOS violation.)

I think it would be a better idea to just delete the offending posts.

Actually we tried that course of action in the beginning, however after much discussion how members wanted to have these situations handled, we decided to go with the numerous suggestions to let the record stand. We use a combination when appropriate, however lean more towards locking.

It will never please everyone, but we do try to make the best decisions for the site. Adding if there is ever a question for a mod or a question on their actions, please feel free to PM any of us.

OK I appreciate the explanation.

I would like to add that you all do a fine job. Thank you !

[eric&gen 0]

LOL. Eric trying to invoke Freedom of Speech on here. Some speech aren't meant to be expressed. For example, throwing tantrums.

I guess throwing tantrums is not a good way to get your point across after a member insults you i just learn to brush them off ignore them not worth being suspended over loool.

[William33 110]

the mods are volunteers that'd be a full time job on some days.

Very well stated. Given our other responsibilities in life (job, family and so forth), it would be rather laborious to cite TOS violation specifics or nail individual posts (although that will occur, if possible).

Moreover, many threads stray so far to the left or right, that the lock should be very obvious to all regular members of VJ.

Overall, we lock about .005 percent of threads, mostly in off topic, MENA and Effects of major family changes on immigration benefits. The issue is that the subject threads draw much passion from the community and are very high profile. Who complains about a 2 year old thread that we closed, that someone inadvertently resurrected anyway? Generally no one.

The passion driven threads are generally hot and unstable. After 5 or 6 posts that are well over the top, we close them. Why, Because TOS violations have occurred and will continue unabated without intervention. This has been proven time and time again.

Edited March 8, 2008 by William33

[Niels Bohr 72]

....that someone inadvertently resurrected anyway? Generally no one.

Speaking of resurrecting threads, I'm going to follow up on what I did last year resurrecting old threads.