OK now I am worried about an RFE

[kaydee457 13]

Well, I have to agree with James on this one although I find his condescending tone grating.

Pieces of evidence you submit are assigned weight, and a Birth Certificate showing that the child was born to the I-751 applicant, and the U.S. Citizen is probably as good as it gets in terms of "proof". However, it's still the preponderance of the evidence submitted and not a single item that results in approval.

Having said that, it's not all that much of a stretch to believe that some aliens, born into overbearing poverty, and anxious to escape it, wouldn't make a child for immigration purposes.

Let's face it, right here in this country, not too long ago, women on welfare were known to make babies to increase their social services income.

Women in border states, mostly illegals, assure that their babies are born in the U.S. and so they have been termed "anchor" babies in the belief that the children will insure that the parents have some future immigration standing.

This is not a term I approve of but it demonstrates that infants are used to provide "an ace in the hole" for immigration purposes sometimes.

[iansig40 1]

I think that you implied that if you have a child then your application should only take a few mins to approve... IMHO the fact that you have children sould not make any diffrence to when your application gets approved or not.... each case should be treated on its own merits .... having a child to the marriage is a strong piece of evidence but the child does not mean you should be approved ahead of a couple who do not have a child...

Kez

Now you're porting over an obviously hyperbolic statement I made earlier on another thread.

I believe I made my point quite clearly and succinctly above.

Kindly give it a rest.

Thank you.

Yes ,we'll give it a rest but....you made your point very clear that having kids proves automatically a genuine relationship

I hope those people at USCIS have a different judgement

[James 2]