Jump to content
w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r

Hillary's faux outrage and Obama's response

 Share

11 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Timeline

And this is how Hillary might still win this thing.

Hillary's faux outrage:

Obama responds:

Firing back at Hillary's criticism of his NAFTA mailers here, Obama said tonight that she can't pick and choose from her husband's administration.

"You can’t be for something or take credit for an administration and 35 years of experience and then when you run for president suggest somehow you didn’t really mean what you said back then," Obama said to applause at a rally of about 5,000. "It doesn't work that way."

He said Clinton had in fact supported the trade deal that is blamed for thousands of job losses in the industrial hub of this state and that is viewed as something akin to cancer by Ohio Democrats.

"The truth is that Sen. Clinton supported NAFTA before she ran for president. That is indisupatable. She called it 'a victory' in her book. She told people it has proved its worth. T hose are facts."

Obama struck a defensive tone in bringing up another matter on which he and Clinton have battled.

"Sen. Clinton also said today, 'Since when do Democrats attack one another on universal health care?'" he quoted her as asking.

"Well, since she started saying that I’m against universal health care, that’s when it started," he answered. "Something that she repeats every single day."

And seeking to portray Clinton as being the negative one in the race, Obama took special note to remind the crowd one of the Democrats' favorite bogeymen.

"She actually compared our campaign to Karl Rove's," Obama said to boos. "That's one I had not heard before."

Man is made by his belief. As he believes, so he is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline
She's slinging mud. That's all she got. If that sways the democrats towards her, then they deserve McCain as President.

One way or the other, she ain't moving into 1600 Penn Ave. :no:

I don't share your optimism. I think Hillary has this in the bag, the rest of us just don't see it yet. There's a master plan and soon it will all be revealed.

hillary_clinton.jpg

Man is made by his belief. As he believes, so he is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (pnd) Country: Canada
Timeline

You know she's freaking out when she brings out the "Karl Rove" ammunition.

*Cheryl -- Nova Scotia ....... Jerry -- Oklahoma*

Jan 17, 2014 N-400 submitted

Jan 27, 2014 NOA received and cheque cashed

Feb 13, 2014 Biometrics scheduled

Nov 7, 2014 NOA received and interview scheduled


MAY IS NATIONAL STROKE AWARENESS MONTH
Educate Yourself on the Warning Signs of Stroke -- talk to me, I am a survivor!

"Life is as the little shadow that runs across the grass and loses itself in the sunset" ---Crowfoot

The true measure of a society is how those who have treat those who don't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline
She's slinging mud. That's all she got. If that sways the democrats towards her, then they deserve McCain as President.

One way or the other, she ain't moving into 1600 Penn Ave. :no:

I don't share your optimism. I think Hillary has this in the bag, the rest of us just don't see it yet. There's a master plan and soon it will all be revealed.

She won't win in November if she gets to run. Not gonna happen.

Love that pic! :thumbs:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

She will try hard, but Obama has the momentum.

I-130 Timeline with USCIS:

It took 92 days for I-130 to get approved from the filing date

NVC Process of I-130:

It took 78 days to complete the NVC process

Interview Process at The U.S. Embassy

Interview took 223 days from the I-130 filing date. Immigrant Visa was issued right after the interview

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Timeline

Yeah Lisa. Obama does acknowledge the experience factor. Note that the reply is from December, 2007, well before the electoral tide began to turn.

WATERLOO, Iowa - Former president Bill Clinton leveled a new attack on Sen. Barack Obama on Friday, arguing that he lacked the experience needed to be president, a criticism that drew a tart response from Obama on Saturday as he campaigned in Waterloo, Iowa.

“When is the last time we elected a president based on one year of service in the Senate before he started running?” the ex-president asked, in an interview with PBS talk show host Charlie Rose which aired Friday night.

Obama began serving in the Senate in 2005.

The former president wondered whether voters are “prepared to roll the dice” on Obama, considering that he has less experience than his rivals for the Democratic presidential nomination Sen. Hillary Clinton or Sen. Joe Biden.

“Even when I was a governor and young and thought I was the best politician in the Democratic Party, I didn't run the first time,” Clinton said, referring to the 1988 campaign.

In response Obama told a press conference Saturday that Clinton himself had said in 1992 when he ran for president that a candidate can “have the right kind of experience or the wrong kind of experience.”

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22273339/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline
Yeah Lisa. Obama does acknowledge the experience factor. Note that the reply is from December, 2007, well before the electoral tide began to turn.

WATERLOO, Iowa - Former president Bill Clinton leveled a new attack on Sen. Barack Obama on Friday, arguing that he lacked the experience needed to be president, a criticism that drew a tart response from Obama on Saturday as he campaigned in Waterloo, Iowa.

“When is the last time we elected a president based on one year of service in the Senate before he started running?” the ex-president asked, in an interview with PBS talk show host Charlie Rose which aired Friday night.

Obama began serving in the Senate in 2005.

The former president wondered whether voters are “prepared to roll the dice” on Obama, considering that he has less experience than his rivals for the Democratic presidential nomination Sen. Hillary Clinton or Sen. Joe Biden.

“Even when I was a governor and young and thought I was the best politician in the Democratic Party, I didn't run the first time,” Clinton said, referring to the 1988 campaign.

In response Obama told a press conference Saturday that Clinton himself had said in 1992 when he ran for president that a candidate can “have the right kind of experience or the wrong kind of experience.”

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22273339/

Well, yeah...that much is clear. I was referring to the people here on VJ and elsewhere that claim that they are 'equally green newbs'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah Lisa. Obama does acknowledge the experience factor. Note that the reply is from December, 2007, well before the electoral tide began to turn.

WATERLOO, Iowa - Former president Bill Clinton leveled a new attack on Sen. Barack Obama on Friday, arguing that he lacked the experience needed to be president, a criticism that drew a tart response from Obama on Saturday as he campaigned in Waterloo, Iowa.

“When is the last time we elected a president based on one year of service in the Senate before he started running?” the ex-president asked, in an interview with PBS talk show host Charlie Rose which aired Friday night.

Obama began serving in the Senate in 2005.

The former president wondered whether voters are “prepared to roll the dice” on Obama, considering that he has less experience than his rivals for the Democratic presidential nomination Sen. Hillary Clinton or Sen. Joe Biden.

“Even when I was a governor and young and thought I was the best politician in the Democratic Party, I didn't run the first time,” Clinton said, referring to the 1988 campaign.

In response Obama told a press conference Saturday that Clinton himself had said in 1992 when he ran for president that a candidate can “have the right kind of experience or the wrong kind of experience.”

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22273339/

Well, yeah...that much is clear. I was referring to the people here on VJ and elsewhere that claim that they are 'equally green newbs'

In reality Obama was a state senator before he was elected to the national senate. So in terms of elected experience Obama is more qualified than Clinton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...