Bloomberg claims vote fraud

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

February 19, 2008 -- Mayor Bloomberg charged yesterday that "fraud" was behind the unofficial results in the New York Democratic presidential primary that produced zero votes for Barack Obama in some districts.

"If you want to call it significant undercounting, I guess that's a euphemism for fraud," said the mayor.

Unofficial tallies on election night gave Obama no votes in 78 out of more than 6,000 election districts.

http://www.nypost.com/seven/02192008/news/...raud__98367.htm

[almaty 19]

no surprise....but fraud in the primaries..wow, speaks of desperation

[no name 1]

no surprise....but fraud in the primaries..wow, speaks of desperation

for O's camp, yes.

[almaty 19]

no surprise....but fraud in the primaries..wow, speaks of desperation

for O's camp, yes.

fraud" was behind the unofficial results in the New York Democratic presidential primary that produced zero votes for Barack Obama in some districts.

how so??

[no name 1]

no surprise....but fraud in the primaries..wow, speaks of desperation

for O's camp, yes.

fraud" was behind the unofficial results in the New York Democratic presidential primary that produced zero votes for Barack Obama in some districts.

how so??

What does Bloomberg have to gain from claiming fraud? Nothing except more votes for O if there's a recount.

[Nagishkaw 510]

Bloomberg needs to just shaaaaadduup and go sit down.

[almaty 19]

[PlatyPius 5]

no surprise....but fraud in the primaries..wow, speaks of desperation

for O's camp, yes.

fraud" was behind the unofficial results in the New York Democratic presidential primary that produced zero votes for Barack Obama in some districts.

how so??

What does Bloomberg have to gain from claiming fraud? Nothing except more votes for O if there's a recount.

So, those districts really DID have zero votes for Obama? Or it was an "accident"? Nope.

So the general Hillbot position is that, since Hillary "won" New York, the uncounted votes for Obama are irrelevant and should be swept under the rug? How well would that go over with Hillary if it were reversed?

From reading all of the stuff online today, I swear that the Hillbots are literally starting to drool and spit when they spout out these completely illogical, nonsensical "Facts"....

[Ban Hammer 13,355]

no surprise....but fraud in the primaries..wow, speaks of desperation

for O's camp, yes.

fraud" was behind the unofficial results in the New York Democratic presidential primary that produced zero votes for Barack Obama in some districts.

how so??

What does Bloomberg have to gain from claiming fraud? Nothing except more votes for O if there's a recount.

So, those districts really DID have zero votes for Obama? Or it was an "accident"? Nope.

So the general Hillbot position is that, since Hillary "won" New York, the uncounted votes for Obama are irrelevant and should be swept under the rug? How well would that go over with Hillary if it were reversed?

From reading all of the stuff online today, I swear that the Hillbots are literally starting to drool and spit when they spout out these completely illogical, nonsensical "Facts"....

don't you know it would look bad for people in ny to vote for hillary

[Dan J 277]

no surprise....but fraud in the primaries..wow, speaks of desperation

for O's camp, yes.

Are fair elections a problem?

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

no surprise....but fraud in the primaries..wow, speaks of desperation

for O's camp, yes.

Are fair elections a problem?

How can this process be fair when Hillary isn't winning?

Duh someone forgot their logic hat!