Jump to content

478 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: England
Timeline
Posted
So babblesgirl, we meet again. :D

Indeed! *raises paws* ;)

I know petitions can't be processed in the exact order in which they are received. But when I see November filers being approved while a whole slew of September filers are still waiting, I think it's a reasonable assumption that cases are not being processed as promised.

Aye, but there are also January filers being approved so is it ok for all January filers to call the RFE line and demand their petition gets moved to an adjudicator? We know the system is unfair but how do you get people to be reasonable about that?

I think the problem is not so much using the RFE line, it's advocating the use of the RFE line when those around you are being approved. It's gonna get silly and they'll shut it down then no one will have any opportunity to push their case along - even when it reaches six months and beyond.

Anyway, point made, what was that cherry drink?

Hi all,

I think it is silly to argue ....all I know is that it make me feel so much better to have been touched....thanks to TBone advise I believe...It does not mean that I will have NOA2 any quicker but at least I had someone looking at my name and the petition...Even if they forget it in a corner now ...We will just call again. I first filed in April 2007 and was told that file was never received, well order was not cash either so I have to believe USCIS....At this point anything helps.

And if Tbone advise can help anyone else to feel better ...it is great !!!

THANK YOU TBONE

(F)

TBone is lovely. It's true.

  • Replies 477
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted
[...] it's a hard ask to get people to be reasonable about using these roundabout methods of speaking to someone who might actually have *some* information on your case, especially given that approvals are all over the calendar right now.

Well, by now, most people here probably have a sense of what's reasonable and what's not.

Can we agree that anything earlier than 3 months after NOA1 date is unreasonably soon to call?

Three months, no word or on-line update: Call to inquire, "Where in the Division is my application, please?" On the basis of the response (if the response is helpful), plan to inquire again in 3 to 5 weeks.

Four months, or if you see from postings here that an unignorable number of applications filed simultaneously with or after yours have been approved: "Where in the Division is my file, please?" Add, "Can you please send an e-mail to the floor to ask them to get it moving to the next station?"

Add further questions the longer you've been waiting.

Si, man?

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted
The RFE trick isn't new. People have been trying around here for about a year or so.

How does it differ from the approach in this thread? For all the commentary about the RFE "trick," I never found where it was posted or any pro/con about it.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Filed: Other Timeline
Posted
[...] it's a hard ask to get people to be reasonable about using these roundabout methods of speaking to someone who might actually have *some* information on your case, especially given that approvals are all over the calendar right now.

Well, by now, most people here probably have a sense of what's reasonable and what's not.

Can we agree that anything earlier than 3 months after NOA1 date is unreasonably soon to call?

Three months, no word or on-line update: Call to inquire, "Where in the Division is my application, please?" On the basis of the response (if the response is helpful), plan to inquire again in 3 to 5 weeks.

Four months, or if you see from postings here that an unignorable number of applications filed simultaneously with or after yours have been approved: "Where in the Division is my file, please?" Add, "Can you please send an e-mail to the floor to ask them to get it moving to the next station?"

Add further questions the longer you've been waiting.

Si, man?

You want a procedure in stone or something, TBone? You want a concrete guideline like 'wait three months'? Why?

The only reason I'm asking - this damn system is sooooooooooo volatile. I've seen it go up and down like a yo-yo on a string for the last three years. VSC is fast, VSC is slow. Nebraska is slow, Nebraska is fast - Nebraska is gone! Adjustment of status in 60 days when it used to take AT LEAST 6-8 months to get an interview........

This system is very fluid, believe it or not. You seem to think USCIS is out to screw you, to just take your money and keep you in the dark like a mushroom. You know what? Someday, when you are reunited with your fiance, you'll hardly remember all this BS!

The RFE trick isn't new. People have been trying around here for about a year or so.

How does it differ from the approach in this thread? For all the commentary about the RFE "trick," I never found where it was posted or any pro/con about it.

I don't know why you haven't seen anything. Honestly. I've been reading about it for ages.

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
Posted

Well, all I can say is that in January I was completely uoset and used to log in in USCIS website 6 or 7 times a day to check if there was any update ...since we had a few touches i manage to restrain myself to 3 times a day :lol::thumbs:

Laurence

10/15/2007 NOA1

04/29/2008 RFE by email

05/03/2008 RFE hard copy received

Reply to RFE sent 05/05/2008

RFE received at CSC 05/06/2008

NOA2 05/15/2008

NOA2 hard copy 05/19/2008

Packet 3 received 06/09/2008

Packet 3 completed and sent 06/10/2008

Medical 06/11/2008

Packet 3 received @ Embassy 06/12/2008

Packet 4 07/03/2008

Interview 07/17/2008

POE 07/31/2008

Wedding 08/08/2008

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted
[...] is it ok for all January filers to call the RFE line and demand their petition gets moved to an adjudicator? We know the system is unfair but how do you get people to be reasonable about that?

Aha! To "demand" is confrontational and will certainly cause the USCIS people to not want to help you. The recommendation is to use reason (length of time that one has been waiting, the reality of grossly out-of-order processing, any unignorable number of simultaneous/later petitions processed before yours) to convince the Immigration Officer to send an e-mail to the floor in hopes that it WILL help you. (It may or may not, and the Officer may or may not -- but we rarely get what we don't ask for. See Mox's analogy above regarding Project X.)

And, some could argue (not I, because I'm lovely, si man): "Why should anyone be reasonable about an unfair system?" I merely became frustrated and began looking for a better mousetrap; the lady ImmigOff suggested one; I tried it; and it helped gain me information, if not also to propel my file a bit more efficiently through the system.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted
You know what? Someday, when you are reunited with your fiance, you'll hardly remember all this BS!

Sadly, we cannot be certain about some of this.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: England
Timeline
Posted
Dangit babblesgirl, I can't for the life of me remember the cherry drink. Were we talking about it in chat, or in a post?

Again agreeing with rebeccajo, the system is way too fluid to set anything in concrete. Criminy, VSC just had a 7 day approval and it wasn't Cuban or an expedite. In the meantime it wasn't that long ago I saw a June filer pop up and meekly ask if there were any other Juners still around.

Dunno. As I said, the system is borked and the RFE trick and others are duct tape and bailing wire. They're jury rigs. And one of the problems with jury rigs is that they resist formalization. Another problem is that they don't always work as expected. TB, this is why I don't think you're ever really going to get a concrete answer about whether your system works or not. Like USCIS, it's just too variable.

Good lord! I completely agree with you.

I think it was in a post.

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted

Well then, my favorite drink is paint-thinner with a little grenadine.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
Posted

evening all!

i'm just snooping as lucian and a few others have a similar timeline to ours.

it'll be interesting to see the difference in approval dates. :wacko:

we've only been touched the once just after filing so that kinda sucks!

hopefully we will all be processed in the next couple of weeks. :thumbs:

best of luck everyone.

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...