Jump to content
TBoneTX

How to Shake Your NOA2 Loose from the CSC

 Share

537 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Timeline
On the basis of the above, I maintain that my suggested approach IS effective, or, if not proven robustly enough yet, at least worth a try.

I definitely agree it's worth a try. I hope some people outside the normal processing times will try and report back in. Nothing is more convincing than hard data. Sitting at just a few weeks shy of 180 days, few more than me are rooting for it to work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 536
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Filed: Other Timeline

The 'profanity' is brit slang. Blame it on my husband rubbing off on me.

I'm not looking for my name to be praised till Sunday. That's not why I hang around here. I work in a law office and my fascination with immigration stems off of that. Plus I love seeing couples reunite. It gives me happy-bumps.

People who are interested in my posts can research them through my post history. Just like they do any other contributing member. You don't have to be 'pinned' around here to be useful. You can check with Captain on that one if you like.

You yourself said your file was in extra checks. Doesn't that explain to you why others who filed around you managed to get ahead of you? This is why I contend your file was moving 'normally' - if there is such a thing.

I'm not suggesting your idea has absolutely no merit. But likewise I do not think you have uncovered the Holy Grail. From what you have posted, I believe your method might be helpful in moving a case off a desk if it has already been completed/adjudicated but just hasn't moved on yet.

Insofar as what Tracy has posted, I do think this 'method' would help alleviate any worry that a case file has been lost or mislaid. Oftentimes I believe this fear is the most debilitating one for petitioners whose files aren't reaching conclusion.

Edited by rebeccajo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Where did she use profanity??? :blink: And as far as telling you where her 'crucial' posts reside - there's this lovely thing called the search feature. Has always worked great for me.

[edited] She just explained it, acceptably. It would be nice if she would point the direction toward the posts that she considers most applicable to those in the waiting-for-NOA2 phase.

Edited by TBoneTX

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where did she use profanity??? :blink: And as far as telling you where her 'crucial' posts reside - there's this lovely thing called the search feature. Has always worked great for me.

[edited] She just explained it, acceptably. It would be nice if she would point the direction toward the posts that she considers most applicable to those in the waiting-for-NOA2 phase.

I didn't realize she had alluded to specific posts of hers. Did I miss that?

SA4userbar.jpg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
I didn't realize she had alluded to specific posts of hers. Did I miss that?

Nope, but if she remembers something of particular value...

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Timeline
I didn't realize she had alluded to specific posts of hers. Did I miss that?

Nope, but if she remembers something of particular value...

I can't think of a specific one.

I can give you one here though.

"When you think you're at the end of your rope - tie a knot and hang on".

Edited by rebeccajo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

(Up-piping) You could have mentioned some of these things in the initial message; thank you for your contributions, which we can all benefit from if you tell us where your crucial posts reside on the VJ site. Also, the inevitable partial-or-more "don't type to me in that tone of voice" misinterpretation of e-mail correspondence (not being completely certain of someone's motives, sincerity, vocal inflections, body language, etc.) affected my interpretation of your post, and for that I apologize. Finally, if your AOS process was unduly long, my sympathies. However, for the sake of credibility, please refrain from using profanity on these boards.

Where did she use profanity??? :blink: And as far as telling you where her 'crucial' posts reside - there's this lovely thing called the search feature. Has always worked great for me.

Perhaps the word "piss" qualifies as profane these days...dunno but that's about the only word that could be [loosley]termed 'profanity'. :unsure:

-P

funny-dog-pictures-wtf.jpg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Dunno how you can take exception w/ someone using the word piss...but there you go. :blink:

Vulgarity versus profanity. Dangerous to use any vulgarity-or-more when arguing with someone here; it's quite another matter (meaning quite appropriate) to use it when referring to USCIS, though! :)

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Timeline
Dunno how you can take exception w/ someone using the word piss...but there you go. :blink:

Vulgarity versus profanity. Dangerous to use any vulgarity-or-more when arguing with someone here; it's quite another matter (meaning quite appropriate) to use it when referring to USCIS, though! :)

As I said, I wasn't even vulgar.

The unfortunate mistake is thinking this was an 'argument' on my part. It was not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
As I said, I wasn't even vulgar.

The unfortunate mistake is thinking this was an 'argument' on my part. It was not.

"An exchanging of ideas."

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Egypt
Timeline

WOW two great days in a row yesterday was the best day i have had in a long time cuz of the touch and im sure that was from my call........and low and behold i looked again after returning from class and i was touched again today.....i dont know if this will work to get an approval but it sure is giving me something to smile about and i also feel that all of this is going on because of the phone call as my case was only touched once in all the time they had it before yesterday...... :yes: would be a great b.day present to have an approval on that day for us lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
WOW two great days in a row yesterday was the best day i have had in a long time cuz of the touch and im sure that was from my call........and low and behold i looked again after returning from class and i was touched again today.....i dont know if this will work to get an approval but it sure is giving me something to smile about and i also feel that all of this is going on because of the phone call as my case was only touched once in all the time they had it before yesterday...... :yes: would be a great b.day present to have an approval on that day for us lol

You surely have the prettiest of smiles, Sara! :)

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Timeline

Well, I might be an 'old timer' but - I do have a pending receipt notice (you see, even once the VisaJourney is over, the ImmigrationJourney is not).

At any rate, I decided to give this a whirl by following the prompts in TBone's original post.

I haven't reached the conclusion of my experiment yet (and won't be able to until tomorrow) but I have already learned that attempting this in the hopes of reaching an Immigration Officer will not work unless you try during normal business hours. My call was directed to the Information Line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...