My K1 Visa rejected - will return back to u.s.

[K1 Sponsor 0]

Thank you all for your valuable posts ....

Yes, I gave them phone calls, yahoo message chats, pictures of the engagements. Those they think were not good enough. I have no other things to give. Of course, airline tickets and passport date stamped to prove the visits. Never enough to the consulate officer. They are challenging me if I am really in a committed relationship. I know I have done all of these petition by myself so there are mistakes. Now, I just have to deal with it. I will get my Senator involve if that doesn't help, lawyer is my next step. I guess I am not in a rush to get my fiancee over here. I got used to live a single life in the past 15 yrs since college life

By the way, there was a sad news from my old college campus yesterday. A gun-man shot 6 students and himself. Omg, god bless Northern IL University students !! My condulences to all of 'em.

[baku 0]

I hope it will all clear up for you soon!!!!

Can you plz give specifics? So, you mentioned you know her since 2004 but have no supporting evidence until 2006. But knowing a person and engaging into relationship is not the same thing, right? I know my fiance since 2005 when I briefly saw her but in fact I started my relationship in 2007 and said in my docs that I KNOW her since 2005 but started communication in 2007. So, I believe it all depends how you put it in the document.

Scenario 1.

You said that you KNOW her since 2004. And didnt' say that you communicated to her thorugh that time until 2006. In this case, an immigration lawyer will clear thing easily.

Scenario 2

You clearly stated you communicated to her in 2004-2006 but didnt' provide support. Then, it is a matter of circumstances - what exactly did you say? This scenario is more difficult for you to resolve than the first one.

[john_and_marlene 162]

The OPs story has changed significantly from the beginning of this thread. We are now being lied to as well. It appears deception is a pattern here.

Compare his most recent posts to his original post.

[K1 Sponsor 0]

The OPs story has changed significantly from the beginning of this thread. We are now being lied to as well. It appears deception is a pattern here.

Compare his most recent posts to his original post.

John,

Please read question #18. I know what I said from the beginning wasn't what I intended in the application. As I look back to that question, I should explain more in details that I didn't have any relationship until 2006. That is the fact. The problem for me now is that there is no way I can convince the CO now.

baku,

My case is scenario #1 but who is there to listen to me? It is hard unless I need a lawyer like many of you guys recommended. I never hire a lawyer and won't know what will be the outcome?

[Stephen1 0]

It seems the NOID is based on the accumulation of all your evidence not just one thing. How many phone bills and chat logs did you send, cause they said you only sent a few. In 2 years or even 1 you should have a ton of phone bills or skype call history or chat logs to submit. You also mentioned you visited again in 2007 in Dec. You should give them all the evidence of that too. I think had you not had evidence of before 2006 but lots from 2006 till now they wouldnt doubt what you say. There may still be hope if you have lots of current evidence.

It seems the NOID is based on the accumulation of all your evidence not just one thing. How many phone bills and chat logs did you send, cause they said you only sent a few. In 2 years or even 1 you should have a ton of phone bills or skype call history or chat logs to submit. You also mentioned you visited again in 2007 in Dec. You should give them all the evidence of that too. I think had you not had evidence of before 2006 but lots from 2006 till now they wouldnt doubt what you say. There may still be hope if you have lots of current evidence.

It seems the NOID is based on the accumulation of all your evidence not just one thing. How many phone bills and chat logs did you send, cause they said you only sent a few. In 2 years or even 1 you should have a ton of phone bills or skype call history or chat logs to submit. You also mentioned you visited again in 2007 in Dec. You should give them all the evidence of that too. I think had you not had evidence of before 2006 but lots from 2006 till now they wouldnt doubt what you say. There may still be hope if you have lots of current evidence.

It seems the NOID is based on the accumulation of all your evidence not just one thing. How many phone bills and chat logs did you send, cause they said you only sent a few. In 2 years or even 1 you should have a ton of phone bills or skype call history or chat logs to submit. You also mentioned you visited again in 2007 in Dec. You should give them all the evidence of that too. I think had you not had evidence of before 2006 but lots from 2006 till now they wouldnt doubt what you say. There may still be hope if you have lots of current evidence.

[NCWife 0]

Hello all,

I am new on this board. Here is my K1 denied petition issue. Please give me any advice if you can. I was introduced to my fiancee in Vietnam in 2006 but I lied in my petition that I met her in 2004. I have no supporting evidence of the relationship between 2004 to 2006. I have evidence from 2006 until now. So, basically they rejected my application and saying that we lack of evidence since 2004. They want to return my petition back to the u.s. for appealing. They didn't tell me when will they return? I have no clue what to do next?

Any advice here? I did the petition all by myself. I didn't go thru. lawyer or service agent. Now, it is too much trouble and headache for me. Helppp. I wrote a letter to my Senator, do you think they can help out my case?

Thanks all.

I met her in Dec 2006 and filed a petition in March of 2007, that was perfectly the right timing. I thought I have to meet the person in 2 yrs that is mainly the reason why I lied. I know that I am a badddd liar.

Meeting her for the first time in 2004 wasn't mean that I was falling in love with her. I broke up with my gf here then I went back in 2006 to fall in love and petitioned her in March 2007. I didn't explain this in detail of question #18.

So, when did you meet her / introduced to her exactly? I am lost....

[NCWife 0]

baku,

My case is scenario #1 but who is there to listen to me? It is hard unless I need a lawyer like many of you guys recommended. I never hire a lawyer and won't know what will be the outcome?

The decision/outcome does not lie in the hands of the lawyer.

[mox 298]

So, when did you meet her / introduced to her exactly? I am lost....

You're not lost. The OP keeps changing his story. I've pretty much lost all compassion at this point, and the outcome to this whole sordid little scandal seems foregone to me now. I'm only sorry that a most-likely innocent woman will have to suffer through all the lies and deceits.

[bakofoil 27]

So, when did you meet her / introduced to her exactly? I am lost....

You're not lost. The OP keeps changing his story. I've pretty much lost all compassion at this point, and the outcome to this whole sordid little scandal seems foregone to me now. I'm only sorry that a most-likely innocent woman will have to suffer through all the lies and deceits.

Totally agree with you. Looks like the system worked as it should in this case, that may sound like a harsh comment but I do think the onus is on the applicants to ensure there is no holes (evidence or storywise) in their petition. I also worry about the beneficiary. Aside from the comments you made, how will she fare if she ever wants to visit the US with a visa denial behind her?

[rakkaus 0]

I'm only sorry that a most-likely innocent woman will have to suffer through all the lies and deceits.

Don't forget that she lied too, at least according to the OP's statements here.

[kaydee457 13]

I'm very confused here.....Was this petition rejected at interview? Did the fiancée lie too, or just tell the truth about the dates?

I thought I read that the petition was being returned for lack of evidence, and no mention of interview, No?

I'm very confused....Admittedly, I didn't read every single post but it certainly appears we're not getting the whole story here.

[NCWife 0]

Yes, she went for the interview and her K1 visa application was rejected at the consulate in Vietnam so the whole package was sent back to the US again for appealing.

As for me, my confusion is just the dates they were introduced to each other. One post says Dec 2006 and another post says Dec 2004. Not sure which is the truth or which is a lie or a typo mistake......

Edited February 16, 2008 by CL79

[vbtbmrt 2]

Hello all,

I am new on this board. Here is my K1 denied petition issue. Please give me any advice if you can. I was introduced to my fiancee in Vietnam in 2006 but I lied in my petition that I met her in 2004. I have no supporting evidence of the relationship between 2004 to 2006. I have evidence from 2006 until now. So, basically they rejected my application and saying that we lack of evidence since 2004. They want to return my petition back to the u.s. for appealing. They didn't tell me when will they return? I have no clue what to do next?

Any advice here? I did the petition all by myself. I didn't go thru. lawyer or service agent. Now, it is too much trouble and headache for me. Helppp. I wrote a letter to my Senator, do you think they can help out my case?

Thanks all.

says you lied you met her in 2004 in your first post then later on you said you just met her in 2004 but didnt have any feeling for her till 2006. so this is where people dont understand did you meet in 2004 or is it you just lied you met in 2004 i can not blame co for returning your case if you fiancee lied for you also. if it is your tring to de fraud the gov. for immigration purposes you forget how many millions they deal with a year and what they see and can detect as fraud. so if it is legit immigration attorney is your only action to solve the issue they get paid well to lie for you

good luck

[destiny1 0]

Hello all,

I am new on this board. Here is my K1 denied petition issue. Please give me any advice if you can. I was introduced to my fiancee in Vietnam in 2006 but I lied in my petition that I met her in 2004. I have no supporting evidence of the relationship between 2004 to 2006. I have evidence from 2006 until now. So, basically they rejected my application and saying that we lack of evidence since 2004. They want to return my petition back to the u.s. for appealing. They didn't tell me when will they return? I have no clue what to do next?

Any advice here? I did the petition all by myself. I didn't go thru. lawyer or service agent. Now, it is too much trouble and headache for me. Helppp. I wrote a letter to my Senator, do you think they can help out my case?

Thanks all.

im afraid to say you might be rejected but well dont get your hopes down.one of my friends lied about phone calls they ask him about billes or anythings he cold give to prove they were calling each other .he couldnt now he have to wait since SPT.well i wish you good luck.

[DerekJ 0]

Hello all,

I am new on this board. Here is my K1 denied petition issue. Please give me any advice if you can. I was introduced to my fiancee in Vietnam in 2006 but I lied in my petition that I met her in 2004. I have no supporting evidence of the relationship between 2004 to 2006. I have evidence from 2006 until now. So, basically they rejected my application and saying that we lack of evidence since 2004. They want to return my petition back to the u.s. for appealing. They didn't tell me when will they return? I have no clue what to do next?

Any advice here? I did the petition all by myself. I didn't go thru. lawyer or service agent. Now, it is too much trouble and headache for me. Helppp. I wrote a letter to my Senator, do you think they can help out my case?

Thanks all.

says you lied you met her in 2004 in your first post then later on you said you just met her in 2004 but didnt have any feeling for her till 2006. so this is where people dont understand did you meet in 2004 or is it you just lied you met in 2004 i can not blame co for returning your case if you fiancee lied for you also. if it is your tring to de fraud the gov. for immigration purposes you forget how many millions they deal with a year and what they see and can detect as fraud. so if it is legit immigration attorney is your only action to solve the issue they get paid well to lie for you

good luck

From what I gathered, they met in 2004 but lied and said they met in 2006. I'm guessing that either the fiancee told the truth about dates or they both lied and the CO learned about 2004 from something in their paperwork. Regardless, they were sloppy about their application and deserved to have the rejection. I don't get this....just tell the truth and let the facts of your relationship speak for itself. If you don't feel you have enough evidence, wait to file and build your case. This process though long and frustrating is rather easy if you're on the up and up.