State of the Union

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

Well frankly I think this president will be favored as much as Ronal Reagan, after time passes.

If Iraq turns into a prosperous shining beacon of democracy arab-shtyle, I can see how.

People will still remember how poorly the war was run, and that Iraq didn't improve until we left (assuming we'll leave if a Dem gets into office). I don't think in the long run Bush would be associated with that democratic Iraq.

I disagree. It will always be Bush's war.

Continuing on the GWB vs Reagan comparison... GWB never achieved anything close to this:

Not even close.

[one...two...tree 2,762]

Well frankly I think this president will be favored as much as Ronal Reagan, after time passes. He's certainly hated as much as Nancy and Ron in their time....Liberals back then absolutely hated them, reallly!!!!

Same old thing....Liberals showing their disdain and looking down their snoots at those that lead.....

I'm misty eyed to see that he's leaving but excited to see what McCain's going do.

Some of the disdain towards Dubbya comes from true conservatives, whom I have a lot more respect for than neo-cons who think they are conservative.

Edited January 29, 2008 by Mister Fancypants

[Alex+R 0]

Well frankly I think this president will be favored as much as Ronal Reagan, after time passes.

If Iraq turns into a prosperous shining beacon of democracy arab-shtyle, I can see how.

People will still remember how poorly the war was run, and that Iraq didn't improve until we left (assuming we'll leave if a Dem gets into office). I don't think in the long run Bush would be associated with that democratic Iraq.

I disagree. It will always be Bush's war.

Continuing on the GWB vs Reagan comparison... GWB never achieved anything close to this:

Not even close.

Never a prouder moment in the history of my people. Even if we know it's cuz Mondale was from there.

[kaydee457 13]

Well frankly I think this president will be favored as much as Ronal Reagan, after time passes.

If Iraq turns into a prosperous shining beacon of democracy arab-shtyle, I can see how.

People will still remember how poorly the war was run, and that Iraq didn't improve until we left (assuming we'll leave if a Dem gets into office). I don't think in the long run Bush would be associated with that democratic Iraq.

I disagree. It will always be Bush's war.

Continuing on the GWB vs Reagan comparison... GWB never achieved anything close to this:

Not even close.

Well jesus....He was running against Jimmy Carter!!!!!! Sort of like running Osama (not Obama) against Ron Paul...

What do you think the outcome would be?

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

Well frankly I think this president will be favored as much as Ronal Reagan, after time passes.

If Iraq turns into a prosperous shining beacon of democracy arab-shtyle, I can see how.

People will still remember how poorly the war was run, and that Iraq didn't improve until we left (assuming we'll leave if a Dem gets into office). I don't think in the long run Bush would be associated with that democratic Iraq.

I disagree. It will always be Bush's war.

Continuing on the GWB vs Reagan comparison... GWB never achieved anything close to this:

Not even close.

Well jesus....He was running against Jimmy Carter!!!!!! Sort of like running Osama (not Obama) against Ron Paul...

What do you think the outcome would be?

1984. Mondale. Read.

[kaydee457 13]

Well frankly I think this president will be favored as much as Ronal Reagan, after time passes.

If Iraq turns into a prosperous shining beacon of democracy arab-shtyle, I can see how.

People will still remember how poorly the war was run, and that Iraq didn't improve until we left (assuming we'll leave if a Dem gets into office). I don't think in the long run Bush would be associated with that democratic Iraq.

I disagree. It will always be Bush's war.

Continuing on the GWB vs Reagan comparison... GWB never achieved anything close to this:

Not even close.

Well jesus....He was running against Jimmy Carter!!!!!! Sort of like running Osama (not Obama) against Ron Paul...

What do you think the outcome would be?

1984. Mondale. Read.

LOL...Same analogy.......

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

Dumbsh1t.

[Alex+R 0]

Whooooooa there.

[Pinocchio Liberal 268]

Wishes and Hopes.Looking for inspirations through others! it's soooo classic. Then comes dissappointment and HATE! It's setting up quite nicely indeed.

[Kazan' Tiger 1]

Hardly!

Am I a bad American because I'm not watching it?

[Pinocchio Liberal 268]

Barrack, is a little boy comin to a man's party. He aint changin squat and everybody knows it.But then again, Dems dreams are made of false hopes and promises. They suck them up like an icecream sundae. So ridiculous!

[Pinocchio Liberal 268]

Well frankly I think this president will be favored as much as Ronal Reagan, after time passes.

If Iraq turns into a prosperous shining beacon of democracy arab-shtyle, I can see how.

People will still remember how poorly the war was run, and that Iraq didn't improve until we left (assuming we'll leave if a Dem gets into office). I don't think in the long run Bush would be associated with that democratic Iraq.

I disagree. It will always be Bush's war.

Continuing on the GWB vs Reagan comparison... GWB never achieved anything close to this:

Not even close.

Well jesus....He was running against Jimmy Carter!!!!!! Sort of like running Osama (not Obama) against Ron Paul...

What do you think the outcome would be?

1984. Mondale. Read.

Awwwwwwwwww, you have always liked things cold an blue.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Hey. We still hate Ronald Reagan. FYI.

Reagan is still pretty controversial outside the US, and there's no shortage of criticism of Maggie Thatcher.

[Pinocchio Liberal 268]

Hey. We still hate Ronald Reagan. FYI.

Reagan is still pretty controversial outside the US, and there's no shortage of criticism of Maggie Thatcher.

The Dems hate him. He was a great pres. He never promised shite. He put it on us, and we followed through. Thats what makes us a grand country. How can follower's ever "LEAD"? Seems that Dems have a prepencity to follow like always. This I can never understand.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

I dunno - doesn't really seem fair to write off the other side without actually hearing what they have to say.

Half the problem with the system so far is people constantly voting along party lines and not for people who actually represent their interests.