Huckabee: Hunting preserves species, actually keeps wildlife alive

[Don_Joy's Prince 0]

"Wooooooooooooooo! Nobody can hunt beaver like the Nature Boy!"

~ Ric Flair

Then maybe he should come on up to the beaver state and give it a try.

[almaty 19]

and he always takes them to space mountain////

[AnewKINDofFEELIN 0]

"Wooooooooooooooo! Nobody can hunt beaver like the Nature Boy!"

~ Ric Flair

Then maybe he should come on up to the beaver state and give it a try.

Ric Flair would kick Oregon's ###.

[almaty 19]

he would warm up with oregon and then give Washington a chop to it's puget sound

[Nagishkaw 510]

He would twist their Edmonton's and injure their Manitoba's while administering a figure four leg lock thusly reducing them to a bunch of Regina's.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

I don't give a rats behind about "huckbee". Your point is ????

Well for one - that there are general moral objections to hunting. That's really all I said. You seem to have taken that general statement and used it to associate me with some sort of anti-hunting political activist group.

It may be a "sensitive" subject for you - but you seem to be spoiling for a fight. And on pretty thin material too. I never claimed to be a "hunting expert" only that that knowledge isn't important to make a moral and ethical judgement.

In other words - "its not for me".

Beyond that, and whether you care about it or not, the OPs article is about Huckabee's claim. No need to take these things so personally.

Moral obligations to hunting ... must mean ... no meat in your diet

Spoiling no ... stated my thoughts and thought I was quite clear. Are your a vegan ... no meat or meat products passes the lips? (Just want to know for discussion reasons.)

I would hope you remember .... I'm an instructor.

How can someone make a judgement ... if the person has zero knowledge of which they judge ?

No I am not a vegan and that has bollocks all to do with it. You do realise of course (as I said at the outset) that Elmer Fudd does not put meat on my table.

On "How can someone make a judgement.." Well people are quite prepared to do it on things like abortion. This is one of those issues... IMO.

Just wondering why you're making more of a deal of my initial statement than there really is, given that the statement was a general one. As I said it seems you're looking for any reason to start a fight.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Now that is a real man! Not all this p#ssy ####### you guys talk about! Try carrying a bull elk that is 800+ pounds up a mountain and skinning it and driving it home. New York p#ssies don't even try it.

The feminization of man in modern society is sickening. That is why women think they want a sensitive touchy feely kind of man and when they get one they disgust them and divorce them post haste!

When men were real men.

When women were real women.

Here's another one - just for the hell of it. When men AND women were real together!

Edited December 27, 2007 by Number 6

[almaty 19]

He would twist their Edmonton's and injure their Manitoba's while administering a figure four leg lock thusly reducing them to a bunch of Regina's.

lol////he chop moose jaw off the map....and pound calgary into flames

Now that is a real man! Not all this p#ssy ####### you guys talk about! Try carrying a bull elk that is 800+ pounds up a mountain and skinning it and driving it home. New York p#ssies don't even try it.

The feminization of man in modern society is sickening. That is why women think they want a sensitive touchy feely kind of man and when they get one they disgust them and divorce them post haste!

When men were real men.

When women were real women.

Here's another one - just for the hell of it.

whoa! that vixen needs a well deserved spanking

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Don't you know all those manly men and women are into S&M bondage!

I mean, seriously - don't you miss when this was the highlight of the evening?

Edited December 27, 2007 by Number 6

[natty bumppo 297]

I don't give a rats behind about "huckbee". Your point is ????

Well for one - that there are general moral objections to hunting. That's really all I said. You seem to have taken that general statement and used it to associate me with some sort of anti-hunting political activist group.

It may be a "sensitive" subject for you - but you seem to be spoiling for a fight. And on pretty thin material too. I never claimed to be a "hunting expert" only that that knowledge isn't important to make a moral and ethical judgement.

In other words - "its not for me".

Beyond that, and whether you care about it or not, the OPs article is about Huckabee's claim. No need to take these things so personally.

Moral obligations to hunting ... must mean ... no meat in your diet

Spoiling no ... stated my thoughts and thought I was quite clear. Are your a vegan ... no meat or meat products passes the lips? (Just want to know for discussion reasons.)

I would hope you remember .... I'm an instructor.

How can someone make a judgement ... if the person has zero knowledge of which they judge ?

No I am not a vegan and that has bollocks all to do with it. You do realise of course (as I said at the outset) that Elmer Fudd does not put meat on my table.

On "How can someone make a judgement.." Well people are quite prepared to do it on things like abortion. This is one of those issues... IMO.

Just wondering why you're making more of a deal of my initial statement than there really is, given that the statement was a general one. As I said it seems you're looking for any reason to start a fight.

wow ...here is the abortion card ....

and since it a general ... *salute*

[almaty 19]

Don't you know all those manly men and women are into S&M bondage!

I mean, seriously - don't you miss when this was the highlight of the evening?

\

lol

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

I don't give a rats behind about "huckbee". Your point is ????

Well for one - that there are general moral objections to hunting. That's really all I said. You seem to have taken that general statement and used it to associate me with some sort of anti-hunting political activist group.

It may be a "sensitive" subject for you - but you seem to be spoiling for a fight. And on pretty thin material too. I never claimed to be a "hunting expert" only that that knowledge isn't important to make a moral and ethical judgement.

In other words - "its not for me".

Beyond that, and whether you care about it or not, the OPs article is about Huckabee's claim. No need to take these things so personally.

Moral obligations to hunting ... must mean ... no meat in your diet

Spoiling no ... stated my thoughts and thought I was quite clear. Are your a vegan ... no meat or meat products passes the lips? (Just want to know for discussion reasons.)

I would hope you remember .... I'm an instructor.

How can someone make a judgement ... if the person has zero knowledge of which they judge ?

No I am not a vegan and that has bollocks all to do with it. You do realise of course (as I said at the outset) that Elmer Fudd does not put meat on my table.

On "How can someone make a judgement.." Well people are quite prepared to do it on things like abortion. This is one of those issues... IMO.

Just wondering why you're making more of a deal of my initial statement than there really is, given that the statement was a general one. As I said it seems you're looking for any reason to start a fight.

wow ...here is the abortion card ....

and since it a general ... *salute*

The abortion card? Hardly... just using abortion as one (obvious) example of an issue where people object to something in moral terms without having direct experience of it.

Beyond all the back and forth over my statement - I seriously wonder what your point is in this thread.

[natty bumppo 297]

I don't give a rats behind about "huckbee". Your point is ????

Well for one - that there are general moral objections to hunting. That's really all I said. You seem to have taken that general statement and used it to associate me with some sort of anti-hunting political activist group.

It may be a "sensitive" subject for you - but you seem to be spoiling for a fight. And on pretty thin material too. I never claimed to be a "hunting expert" only that that knowledge isn't important to make a moral and ethical judgement.

In other words - "its not for me".

Beyond that, and whether you care about it or not, the OPs article is about Huckabee's claim. No need to take these things so personally.

Moral obligations to hunting ... must mean ... no meat in your diet

Spoiling no ... stated my thoughts and thought I was quite clear. Are your a vegan ... no meat or meat products passes the lips? (Just want to know for discussion reasons.)

I would hope you remember .... I'm an instructor.

How can someone make a judgement ... if the person has zero knowledge of which they judge ?

No I am not a vegan and that has bollocks all to do with it. You do realise of course (as I said at the outset) that Elmer Fudd does not put meat on my table.

On "How can someone make a judgement.." Well people are quite prepared to do it on things like abortion. This is one of those issues... IMO.

Just wondering why you're making more of a deal of my initial statement than there really is, given that the statement was a general one. As I said it seems you're looking for any reason to start a fight.

wow ...here is the abortion card ....

and since it a general ... *salute*

The abortion card? Hardly... just using abortion as one (obvious) example of an issue where people object to something in moral terms without having direct experience of it.

Beyond all the back and forth over my statement - I seriously wonder what your point is in this thread.

and yours is ?

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

I don't give a rats behind about "huckbee". Your point is ????

Well for one - that there are general moral objections to hunting. That's really all I said. You seem to have taken that general statement and used it to associate me with some sort of anti-hunting political activist group.

It may be a "sensitive" subject for you - but you seem to be spoiling for a fight. And on pretty thin material too. I never claimed to be a "hunting expert" only that that knowledge isn't important to make a moral and ethical judgement.

In other words - "its not for me".

Beyond that, and whether you care about it or not, the OPs article is about Huckabee's claim. No need to take these things so personally.

Moral obligations to hunting ... must mean ... no meat in your diet

Spoiling no ... stated my thoughts and thought I was quite clear. Are your a vegan ... no meat or meat products passes the lips? (Just want to know for discussion reasons.)

I would hope you remember .... I'm an instructor.

How can someone make a judgement ... if the person has zero knowledge of which they judge ?

No I am not a vegan and that has bollocks all to do with it. You do realise of course (as I said at the outset) that Elmer Fudd does not put meat on my table.

On "How can someone make a judgement.." Well people are quite prepared to do it on things like abortion. This is one of those issues... IMO.

Just wondering why you're making more of a deal of my initial statement than there really is, given that the statement was a general one. As I said it seems you're looking for any reason to start a fight.

wow ...here is the abortion card ....

and since it a general ... *salute*

The abortion card? Hardly... just using abortion as one (obvious) example of an issue where people object to something in moral terms without having direct experience of it.

Beyond all the back and forth over my statement - I seriously wonder what your point is in this thread.

and yours is ?

Clearly missed.

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

I declare this pissing match a tie