Dream Turns Nightmare: Milwaukee Police Officer to Be Deported

[one...two...tree 2,762]

Let's all get our jollies from bitchin on this guy, what fun it is! I mean, he's being deported, the law is being followed, rejoyce!

What's with your love of illegal immigration? What's wrong with entering this country legally?

What's with being a legal zealot as if all applications of existing laws equal justice? Some of you throw out all reason when it comes to cases of immigration, siding with the letter of the law as if it were God Himself.

wow ... noticed LuckS questions were answered with questions. the answers to his questions are ...

Rhetorical question meet rhetorical question.

[natty bumppo 297]

Let's all get our jollies from bitchin on this guy, what fun it is! I mean, he's being deported, the law is being followed, rejoyce!

What's with your love of illegal immigration? What's wrong with entering this country legally?

What's with being a legal zealot as if all applications of existing laws equal justice? Some of you throw out all reason when it comes to cases of immigration, siding with the letter of the law as if it were God Himself.

wow ... noticed LuckS questions were answered with questions. the answers to his questions are ...

Rhetorical question meet rhetorical question.

rhetorically speaking ....

[Ban Hammer 13,346]

Technically, if I were a criminal arrested by this cop and convicted with testimony from this cop, I'd be petitoning for the decision to be reversed, and the original charge to be thrown out.

This cop has put society in jeopardy by leaving such a possibility open to all the criminals he put behind bars. FURTHERMORE, I'd like to know if when he caught someone breaking the law, whether a sob story could sway him from doing what he had to do....if it didn't, then he has no business doing such an emotional mindfock with this piece here.....and if he ever was able to be swayed, and let ppl off because of 'circumstances'...then he wasn't a good cop in the first place.

[Dr. A ♥ O 203]

It's a multi-media article so you get to hear his voice while he tells his story for 7-8 mins. Has anyone gone to the site and listened to him tell his story?

I don't agree with what he did in regards to his personal choices but I also don't agree he should be deported. It's being stuck between a rock and hard spot.

[mawilson 2,133]

But when Mr. Ayala-Cornejo filled out recruitment papers, he used the name of a dead relative who had been a United States citizen.

That is ID theft any way you slice it even if the victim of the theft happens to be deceased.

What's the harm is stealing a dead person's identity?

Ask the SSA. Ask the election officials. And on it goes. There are plenty of reasons why stealing even a dead's person identity is wrong. I, for one, rather not have a guy that can't appreciate just how wrong it is patrol our streets in uniform and with a handgun.

I'm asking you.

A "crime" is usually defined as something that hurts either the public or another person, directly or indirectly.

Who is the "victim" of "identity theft" if the person whose identity was stolen is already dead?

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

But when Mr. Ayala-Cornejo filled out recruitment papers, he used the name of a dead relative who had been a United States citizen.

That is ID theft any way you slice it even if the victim of the theft happens to be deceased.

What's the harm is stealing a dead person's identity?

Ask the SSA. Ask the election officials. And on it goes. There are plenty of reasons why stealing even a dead's person identity is wrong. I, for one, rather not have a guy that can't appreciate just how wrong it is patrol our streets in uniform and with a handgun.

I'm asking you.

A "crime" is usually defined as something that hurts either the public or another person, directly or indirectly.

Who is the "victim" of "identity theft" if the person whose identity was stolen is already dead?

I already answered that earlier. Go back and read.

[natty bumppo 297]

But when Mr. Ayala-Cornejo filled out recruitment papers, he used the name of a dead relative who had been a United States citizen.

That is ID theft any way you slice it even if the victim of the theft happens to be deceased.

What's the harm is stealing a dead person's identity?

Ask the SSA. Ask the election officials. And on it goes. There are plenty of reasons why stealing even a dead's person identity is wrong. I, for one, rather not have a guy that can't appreciate just how wrong it is patrol our streets in uniform and with a handgun.

I'm asking you.

A "crime" is usually defined as something that hurts either the public or another person, directly or indirectly.

Who is the "victim" of "identity theft" if the person whose identity was stolen is already dead?

Some information ....

"The short answer is that identity theft is a crime. Identity theft and identity fraud are terms used to refer to all types of crime in which someone wrongfully obtains and uses another person's personal data in some way that involves fraud or deception, typically for economic gain.

The Department of Justice prosecutes cases of identity theft and fraud under a variety of federal statutes. In the fall of 1998, for example, Congress passed the Identity Theft and Assumption Deterrence Act . This legislation created a new offense of identity theft, which prohibits knowingly transfer[ring] or us[ing], without lawful authority, a means of identification of another person with the intent to commit, or to aid or abet, any unlawful activity that constitutes a violation of Federal law, or that constitutes a felony under any applicable State or local law.

18 U.S.C. § 1028(a)(7). This offense, in most circumstances, carries a maximum term of 15 years' imprisonment, a fine, and criminal forfeiture of any personal property used or intended to be used to commit the offense.

Schemes to commit identity theft or fraud may also involve violations of other statutes such as identification fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1028), credit card fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1029), computer fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1030), mail fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1341), wire fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1343), or financial institution fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1344). Each of these federal offenses are felonies that carry substantial penalties ­ in some cases, as high as 30 years' imprisonment, fines, and criminal forfeiture.

Federal prosecutors work with federal investigative agencies such as the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the United States Secret Service, and the United States Postal Inspection Service to prosecute identity theft and fraud cases."

USDOJ

[mawilson 2,133]

Ask the SSA. Ask the election officials. And on it goes. There are plenty of reasons why stealing even a dead's person identity is wrong. I, for one, rather not have a guy that can't appreciate just how wrong it is patrol our streets in uniform and with a handgun.

I'm asking you.

A "crime" is usually defined as something that hurts either the public or another person, directly or indirectly.

Who is the "victim" of "identity theft" if the person whose identity was stolen is already dead?

I already answered that earlier. Go back and read.

No you didn't. Don't BS me.

[mawilson 2,133]

Schemes to commit identity theft or fraud may also involve violations of other statutes such as identification fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1028), credit card fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1029), computer fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1030), mail fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1341), wire fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1343), or financial institution fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1344). Each of these federal offenses are felonies that carry substantial penalties ­ in some cases, as high as 30 years' imprisonment, fines, and criminal forfeiture.

USDOJ

That's the letter of the law. The spirit of the law is far more important.

[Dr. A ♥ O 203]

"typically for economic gain."

My guess: The victims are all the American people who are attempting to make an "honest" pay check and pay taxes to the government to support the salaries of what they hope are "honest" law enforcers.

Edited December 23, 2007 by OlivianWaleed

[natty bumppo 297]

"typically for economic gain."

My guess: The victims are all the American people who are attempting to make an "honest" pay check and pay taxes to the government to support the salaries of what they hope are "honest" law enforcers.

:lol: This story is about an illegal who got caught with a stolen identity. Please leave it there.

At the end of the day ... he wanted a career in a field that performed a background check (and a tip was also received) and he got caught.

His gain economically ... was to work with somebody elses identity. Also wonder if he had credit cards, bank loans ... etc. with the stolen identity?

I wish him a nice life life in his own country.

I also hope that you never become a victim of identity theft of any kind ... as it's not fun getting things corrected.

Edited December 23, 2007 by Natty Bumppo

[Dr. A ♥ O 203]

Actually I have recentally become a victim of identity theft but that's another topic for another day.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

Ask the SSA. Ask the election officials. And on it goes. There are plenty of reasons why stealing even a dead's person identity is wrong. I, for one, rather not have a guy that can't appreciate just how wrong it is patrol our streets in uniform and with a handgun.

I'm asking you.

A "crime" is usually defined as something that hurts either the public or another person, directly or indirectly.

Who is the "victim" of "identity theft" if the person whose identity was stolen is already dead?

I already answered that earlier. Go back and read.

No you didn't. Don't BS me.

It hurts the public when a person gains the right to vote by stealing the identity of a dead USC. It hurts the public when a person with and through the identity of a dead person starts patrolling our streets as a law enforcement officer. It's not that hard to see. And I did say it earlier - highlighted it for you.

[natty bumppo 297]

Actually I have recentally become a victim of identity theft but that's another topic for another day.

Been there too ... not fun. Hope everything works out okay for you.

[mawilson 2,133]

"typically for economic gain."

My guess: The victims are all the American people who are attempting to make an "honest" pay check and pay taxes to the government to support the salaries of what they hope are "honest" law enforcers.

Assuming another identity doesn't make him dishonest. I can change my identity tomorrow

and call myself "John Gupt". It's a free country, you can use any name you want.