Zogby: Obama would defeat all five top GOP candidates in general, Hillary or Edwards would not!

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

UTICA, New York - Illinois Sen. Barack Obama would defeat all five of the top Republicans in prospective general election contests, performing better than either of his two top rivals, a new Zogby telephone poll shows.

Obama

Obama leads Romney 53%-35%

Obama leads Huckabee 47%-42%

Obama leads Giuliani 48%-39%

Obama leads McCain 47%-43%

Obama leads Thompson 52%-36%

Hillary

Hillary leads Romney 46%-44%

Hillary behind Huckabee 48%-43%

Hillary behind Giuliani 46%-42%

Hillary leads McCain 49%-42%

Hillary leads Thompson 48%-42%

Edwards

Edwards leads Romney 50%-38%

Edwards leads Huckabee 47%-41%

Edwards behind Giuliani 45%-44%

Edwards behind McCain 46%-42%

Edwards leads Thompson 51%-35%

http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=1404

[JODO 2]

It's still early,but very interesting.

T4P

[Peikko 1,575]

I love these telephone polls, 1,000 people nationwide hehehehehehe.

Anyway, I don't care, I want Britney to be president!

[Fandango 1,439]

I said this ages ago and I think ppl laughed, but a Hill nom imo would guarantee another GOP Prez......

GO HILL!

[no name 1]

His margins of advantage range from a 4 percent edge over Arizona Sen. John McCain and a 5 percent edge over Arkansas’ Mike Huckabee to an 18 percentage point lead over Mitt Romney of Massachusetts, the survey shows. Against New York’s Rudy Giuliani he leads by 9%, and against Fred Thompson of Tennessee he holds a 16 point edge.

The telephone survey included 1,000 likely voters nationwide and carries a margin of error of +/– 3.2 percentage points.

Edited December 21, 2007 by devilette

[MrConservative 0]

His margins of advantage range from a 4 percent edge over Arizona Sen. John McCain and a 5 percent edge over Arkansas' Mike Huckabee to an 18 percentage point lead over Mitt Romney of Massachusetts, the survey shows. Against New York's Rudy Giuliani he leads by 9%, and against Fred Thompson of Tennessee he holds a 16 point edge.

The telephone survey included 1,000 likely voters nationwide and carries a margin of error of +/– 3.2 percentage points.

Keep hanging onto that dream! Or should I say fantasy? You seem to ignore the fact that a few months ago she was a shoe-in. At this rate, by the time the election comes next year she will be an also-ran.

Edited December 21, 2007 by MrConservative

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

You seem to ignore the fact that a few months ago she was a shoe-in.

Seriously. A few months ago she was 'inevitable'. Today, her activists are hanging their hopes on the margin of error.

[Peikko 1,575]

But, Devilette isn't one of her activists, tsk, tsk!

[no name 1]

Wow, my ears were burning.

PS: I always post margin of error on polls. I also posted how polls mean squat, but hey, why mention it - that doesn't help your biased point, does it?

I could give 2 sh*ts what you think, BTW.

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

I was referring to the posters on liberal blogs I was surfing right before I wrote that post. I was not referring to devilette. If I was, I would've said so.

[no name 1]

I was referring to the posters on liberal blogs I was surfing right before I wrote that post. I was not referring to devilette. If I was, I would've said so.

thx G

[Peikko 1,575]

Oh, do we have to all play nice in the sandbox today? I must have missed the memo.

[Dan J 277]

You seem to ignore the fact that a few months ago she was a shoe-in.

Seriously. A few months ago she was 'inevitable'. Today, her activists are hanging their hopes on the margin of error.

Wasn't that kind of the same in the last cycle? Dean was leading early on, but faltered by the time the nomination came around.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

Fred's still running?

Someone better wake him up and tell him.