Congratulations to the record-breaking Senate GOP — Most. Obstructionist. Ever.

[one...two...tree 2,762]

For quite a while, many of us have wondered whether Republican officials in Washington have any apparent talents at all. Governing is clearly not their strong suit, but are they completely without skills?

Absolutely not. The 49-member Senate Republican minority has done something no Senate minority in American history has ever done: they’ve filibustered more bills than any Congress ever has — and they broke the record with a full year to spare.

The latest came this morning, when the Senate GOP filibustered an omnibus budget bill, the 62nd Republican filibuster since the 110th Congress began in January.

“In just one session, a minority in Congress has prevented a mind-blowing 62 pieces of legislation from going to the floor for an up or down vote,” said Campaign for America’s Future co-director Roger Hickey. “Our report shows how over and over again, the uncompromising minority has thwarted the will of majorities in Congress and of the American people, holding the Senate floor hostage to a radical right-wing agenda.” […]

Eric Lotke, Campaign for America’s Future research director and lead author of the new report, calls the obstruction a “deliberate strategy.” He observes that the congressional Republicans block legislation, then blame the Democrats for getting nothing done. “It’s like mugging the postman and then complaining that the mail isn’t delivered on time.”

Brian Young, noting the historic quality of the achievement, added, “Only a group with a near-pathological disregard for the actual health of our democracy, only a group with a single-minded focus on the cynical political strategies of their consultants, only a group with an imperious disdain for the people of the country could’ve pulled off such a feat.”

Quite right. This was a record that wasn’t meant to be broken. The “Roadblock Republican” label is not meant as a compliment.

http://www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com/

[GaryC 7]

You just love that left wing looney blog the carpetbagger. No one but you takes them seriously. I prefer to think of the GOP giving the dems a taste of their own medicine and stopping them from getting their left wing agenda through. Way to go GOP! The less the congress does the better in my mind. Whenever the left does something it always costs us more money. Gridlock is good when the dems run things.

[Fandango 1,439]

It totally SHOULD be a compliment. The minority is ruling, huzzah!

[Sheriff Uling 3]

Only a true republican would be offended by this (((SHRUGS)))

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

You suck. Yeah, you. Whoever you are!

[no name 1]

You just love that left wing looney blog the carpetbagger. No one but you takes them seriously. I prefer to think of the GOP giving the dems a taste of their own medicine and stopping them from getting their left wing agenda through. Way to go GOP! The less the congress does the better in my mind. Whenever the left does something it always costs us more money. Gridlock is good when the dems run things.

yeah, those Dems & their damn Iraq war!

[GaryC 7]

You just love that left wing looney blog the carpetbagger. No one but you takes them seriously. I prefer to think of the GOP giving the dems a taste of their own medicine and stopping them from getting their left wing agenda through. Way to go GOP! The less the congress does the better in my mind. Whenever the left does something it always costs us more money. Gridlock is good when the dems run things.

yeah, those Dems & their damn Iraq war!

Yeah, your right. They just keep giving Bush the money. I thought they were going to cut off funding and bring the troops home? I guess they changed their minds huh?

House approves $70 billion more for war

WASHINGTON - Congress approved $70 billion Wednesday for military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, a bitter finish for majority Democrats who tried to force a change in President Bush's war policy.

The House's 272-142 vote also sent the president a $555 billion catchall spending bill that combines the war money with money for 14 Cabinet departments.

Bush and his Senate GOP allies forced the Iraq money upon anti-war Democrats as the price for permitting the year-end budget deal to pass and be signed. But other Democrats were eager to avoid being seen as not supporting troops who are in harm's way — and avoid weeks of bashing by Bush for failing to provide that money.

"This is a blank check," complained Rep. Jim McGovern, D-Mass. "The new money in this bill represents one cave-in too many. It is an endorsement of George Bush's policy of endless war."

The vote reflected the reluctance by each party to deny money to troops in the field. At the same time, anti-war Democrats had found their position weakened by the decline in violence in Iraq.

War spending aside, Bush's GOP allies were divided over whether the overall spending bill was a victory for their party in the monthslong fight with Democrats over agency budgets.

Conservatives and outside groups such as the Club for Growth, which seeks to elect lawmakers opposed to tax and spending increases, criticized the bill for having about $28 billion in domestic spending that topped Bush's budget and was paid for by a combination of "emergency" spending, transfers from the defense budget and other maneuvers.

Republican leaders acknowledged some excesses. But they said the measure could have cost a lot more if the GOP and the White House not stood firm against more than $20 billion in additional domestic spending included in Democratic spending bills that passed last summer.

"The fact is we got the number down to the baseline," said House Minority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio.

Boehner supported moves that effectively broke Bush's budget cap to provide record budget increases for veterans and to build a fence and provide additional security along the U.S.-Mexico border.

While disappointed on the Iraq money, Democrats said the spending bill smoothed the rough edges of the president's February budget plan. That proposal had sought below-inflation increases for most domestic programs and contained numerous cuts and program eliminations.

For Democrats, just finishing the budget ended up as the driving goal. They wanted to avoid the humiliation of failing to enact the spending bills after criticizing then-majority Republicans for not doing so last year.

The spending legislation affects virtually every part of the government other than the Defense Department's core programs. It would pay for food and toy safety inspections, NASA, the FBI, the Coast Guard, education, health research and national park operations.

It also contains about 9,000 pet projects sought by lawmakers, at a cost of more than $7 billion, according to Taxpayers for Common Sense, a Washington-based group that fights such projects.

The bill would raise the pay of federal civilian workers by 3.5 percent, extend farm subsidies the food stamp program until March 15 and eliminated money for a next generation nuclear warhead. It also would keep banks from entering the real estate business.

But the White House succeeded in using veto threats to rid the bill of more contentious items such as ending a ban on U.S. aid to overseas family planning groups that perform abortions and easing financing of agricultural and medical sales to Cuba.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071219/ap_on_...o/budget_battle

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

You just love that left wing looney blog the carpetbagger. No one but you takes them seriously. I prefer to think of the GOP giving the dems a taste of their own medicine and stopping them from getting their left wing agenda through. Way to go GOP! The less the congress does the better in my mind. Whenever the left does something it always costs us more money. Gridlock is good when the dems run things.

Isn't that attitide precisely why ####### all ever gets done in Congress unless you have a massive, overwhelming majority?

[kerewin21 2]

You just love that left wing looney blog the carpetbagger. No one but you takes them seriously. I prefer to think of the GOP giving the dems a taste of their own medicine and stopping them from getting their left wing agenda through. Way to go GOP! The less the congress does the better in my mind. Whenever the left does something it always costs us more money. Gridlock is good when the dems run things.

That's true, I definitely wouldn't want them wasting any time on requring USCIS to be more efficient with their applications. Filibuster on, Republicans!

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

Where's Bush demanding up-or-down votes on measures?