Jump to content

pushbrk

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    40,175

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    49

pushbrk last won the day on September 2

pushbrk had the most liked content!

88 Followers

See all followers

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • City
    Dumaguete

Immigration Info

  • Immigration Status
    Other
  • Place benefits filed at
    California Service Center
  • Local Office
    Spokane WA
  • Country
    China
  • Our Story
    The marriage associated with immigration ended after 12 years.

Immigration Timeline & Photos

pushbrk's Achievements

Grand Master

Grand Master (14/14)

  • Helpful Reply Rare
  • Amazing Content Rare
  • Helpful Reply Rare
  • Helpful Reply Rare
  • First Post

Recent Badges

13.8k

Reputation

Recent Profile Visitors

80,340 profile views
  1.    pushbrk reacted to a post in a topic: I-864 Question – Using Assets to Qualify
  2.    JD2 reacted to a post in a topic: Applied i-130 in Canada but moved to US through L1B before i-130 approved
  3.    Reynal2m reacted to a post in a topic: I-864 Question – Using Assets to Qualify
  4. pushbrk
    Yes, I think it is worth trying, but I also like S2N's answer.
  5.    pushbrk reacted to a post in a topic: I-864 Question – Using Assets to Qualify
  6. pushbrk
    Yes, information from three years, but since there is no qualifying past income to document, only the latest transcript is required. No problem including all three though.
  7.    OldUser reacted to a post in a topic: I-864 transcripts
  8. pushbrk
    Pay stubs are only to document current income. If you don't have current income, sounds like you will also need a qualified joint sponsor.
  9. pushbrk
    You are going to need information from three past tax returns, but are only required to provide the latest year's transcript. Pay stubs are used as evidence of current income. What you will need depends on the full circumstances you have not mentioned.
  10. pushbrk
    Yes, that's the more efficient way to complete the immigration process.
  11.    pushbrk reacted to a post in a topic: Applied i-130 in Canada but moved to US through L1B before i-130 approved
  12.    OldUser reacted to a post in a topic: Bona Fide Evidence for Visa Appointment
  13.    KMG reacted to a post in a topic: Bona Fide Evidence for Visa Appointment
  14. pushbrk
    The most crucial evidence is the evidence you were staying together long term. You entry and exit stamps in your passport are primary evidence of that, as are airline boarding passes. Photos are secondary but include if you have. Leave out the wire transfers. They are evidence of money going one way, not comingling of finances. Evidence you are supporting the foreign spouse are not helpful to the foreign spouse showing a bona fide relationship with a US Citizen Petitioner. Skip the chats. Your time together is far more important.
  15.    TBoneTX reacted to a post in a topic: I-864 Question – Using Assets to Qualify
  16.    TBoneTX reacted to a post in a topic: I-864 Question – Using Assets to Qualify
  17.    JD2 reacted to a post in a topic: I-864 Question – Using Assets to Qualify
  18. pushbrk
    I understand the belt and suspenders mind set, but I don't subscribe to it in this context. Avoiding obligating a joint sponsor when not absolutely necessary would be my priority. YMMV
  19.    OldUser reacted to a post in a topic: Expedite request for pending forms I-130 for minor children
  20. pushbrk
    Everything has a context. The reason you would file an I-864 with no income or assets is that the petitioner is required to do so in that circumstance. In such a case, a joint sponsor would be required. In the OP's situation, they clearly qualify, and the home equity would be considered within its context as part of the totality of circumstances. By your logic marriages fail often, so why would anybody try it? Qualifying as sponsor using assets is allowed. It requires properly completed affidavit and properly documented qualifying assets. Anything marginal is risky, but those will clearly qualifying finances are routinely successful using assets to sponsor an immigrant.
  21. pushbrk
    This is an example of documentation and completion errors. They qualified, but what they presented did not make that clear enough.
  22.    Edward and Jaycel reacted to a post in a topic: I-864 Question – Using Assets to Qualify
  23. pushbrk
    Easier for me, as I primarily hang out in the spouse visa forum. However it is not correct that USCIS or Consular Officers "do not allow" equity in a primary resident to be used as an asset. What's true is they don't consider it liquid. In this case, they will know the sponsor has lower expenses because they pay no rent, and they have sufficient liquid assets to make up for the income shortfall.
  24. pushbrk
    Too general. When done properly, this should be fine. It's the D/R, not India.
  25. pushbrk
    USCIS will not be involved in the financial part of the decision on a spouse visa case. That is all submitted to NVC and the Consulate.
  26. pushbrk
    The 90k in the bank can carry the day. Just a few statements with the oldest being at least a year old will do. With regard to the apartment, sure listing it as an assets and documenting the equity is certainly allowed, but when evaluated, the equity will not be considered liquid. What it's good for is to show you don't pay rent, and are solvent. USCIS has nothing to do with evaluating an Affidavit of Support in a spouse visa case. That will be NVC and a Consular Officer.
  27. pushbrk
    Time to "come to jesus" on this. You were advised properly back in February.
  28. pushbrk
    Just so you understand, you must do this before you file petitions for the children. If you file and they get denied at interview, your husband will have a visa that expires in six months and your children will have nothing and no way to accompany your husband to the USA.
×
×
  • Create New...