Notice to Members: Logging into VisaJourney will soon require using your email address vs. screen name. Please ensure your email address is valid or contact admin@visajourney if you need help.
pushbrk
-
Posts
40,493 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
59
.thumb.jpg.bca21409c6d2583d23d463e1b0e8d8cc.jpg)
Immigration Timeline & Photos
pushbrk's Achievements
-
TBoneTX reacted to a post in a topic:
Submitting new I130 while waiting old one withdrawl
-
Experienced senior members here tend to go beyond the questions asked, and point out issues posters may or may not have considered. Cooperation is appreciated, as it is reciprocal. 😉 -
All good and understandable. But, USCIS does not issue visas. Getting the petition approved is the easy part. Anyway, now you have actually answered the posed question. You did not begin the new relationship until after the divorce. It's such an easy question to answer, but you kept avoiding it. This kind of "avoidance" will not return a good result if it happens in a visa interview. When your wife gets to that stage, make sure she understands how important it is to understand and directly answer every question, the question that is asked, whether you like it or think it is important or not. Yes, many of us DO understand your culture. What I didn't understand was you reluctance to directly answer the question you were being asked. Carry on.
-
S2N reacted to a post in a topic:
Submitting new I130 while waiting old one withdrawl
-
TBoneTX reacted to a post in a topic:
Submitting new I130 while waiting old one withdrawl
-
appleblossom reacted to a post in a topic:
Submitting new I130 while waiting old one withdrawl
-
Then it looks like the lawyer is quoting an official source. That's what you're paying for.
-
Maybe there is a language barrier here, but you still have not addressed the timing of starting the relationship with the new spouse. It's different from the divorce and marriage dates. The question does not related to legalities, but it is relevant to the totality of circumstances. You did not begin your relationship with the current spouse on your wedding date. It was before that. You are likely to be asked if the relationship started before the divorce was final, and if you give a deceptive answer like you are giving here, instead of addressing the issue directly, it is that lack of candor that will hurt you, much more than the facts themselves.
-
So, when she actually has the document, you will have this sorted. While the two quotes you copied and pasted seem correct, there are many sources of false information. When you copy and paste, it's best to disclose the source.
-
pushbrk reacted to a post in a topic:
Advice on how to survive waiting for CR-1 process now with travel ban
-
The asylum seeker with no passport is unfamiliar for me. Again, traveling during the process, is commonly only really practical for the US Citizen when coming from many countries anyway. She will need some sort of travel document for the visa to be issued. That would be the first thing I would want to sort out, in your circumstances.
-
Ontarkie reacted to a post in a topic:
Advice on how to survive waiting for CR-1 process now with travel ban
-
Lance27 reacted to a post in a topic:
Advice on how to survive waiting for CR-1 process now with travel ban
-
Aluvaboy reacted to a post in a topic:
Advice on how to survive waiting for CR-1 process now with travel ban
-
TBoneTX reacted to a post in a topic:
Advice on how to survive waiting for CR-1 process now with travel ban
-
TBoneTX reacted to a post in a topic:
Submitting new I130 while waiting old one withdrawl
-
TBoneTX reacted to a post in a topic:
Submitting new I130 while waiting old one withdrawl
-
You did not directly say it. You've never directly addressed (in this thread) whether your relationship (not your marriage) began before your divorce was final. Whether it did or didn't, is a technicality that is relevant. Another poster alluded to that possibility and your response avoided addressing the issue directly. That's easy for you to clear up if you want.
-
We members here who went through the spouse visa process, all endured separation, and in most cases, it was the US Citizen Petitioner who had to do all the travel for visits. If you spent three months in Turkey with your spouse already, that's more than many of us had altogether. Yes, it's difficult, but also wonderful that you can visit again during the process. Look forward to that. Stay in regular contact. You'll still need to qualify as your wife's financial sponsor, so we understand the need to work. She will understand too. One thing to do to further occupy your mind, is to learn what's coming next, including becoming an A-student of the I-864 and its separate instructions.
-
A petition can only be actually withdrawn through USCIS. You ask no question, but now a formal withdrawal letter, simply from and signed by you is all that is needed for the old case. You can file a new one at any time. What will happen with the new case depends on the details of the new case. Some concerns have already been expressed, including the fact that you started a new relationship before your divorce was final. There are no direct questions about that on the I-130, and there is certainly no prohibition from doing so. You will be required to indicate the when, and who of your first filing and the outcome which simply "Withdrawn after divorce" The new new case must stand on its own merits.
-
I'm sure too. If you are employed making a good income, just leave the asset portion of the form blank. You don't need anything from the bank or other financial institution.
-
pushbrk reacted to a post in a topic:
Financial Institution Having a Hard Time Providing Evidence for I-134
-
OK, great. Montreal has a US Consulate. The embassy is in Ottawa. Did you have a question? I do? For our education, how and/or why did your Canadian wife seek asylum in the USA?
-
I-864 income for 3 years.
pushbrk replied to Hank63452's topic in IR-1 / CR-1 Spouse Visa Process & Procedures
Yes, I see the same thing. For you and all, many are lazy typers and refer to tax transcript instead of typing tax return transcripts. Only the tax return transcript is applicable in our context. If you don't see "total income" it's the wrong transcript. -
pushbrk reacted to a post in a topic:
I-864 income for 3 years.
-
They are not. If you are confident you have submitted a well qualified affidavit of support package, I would disregard the message. You are now document qualified, and in the queue for an interview.
-
Oh, you're right. They changed the message a little lately, I guess. The old one says something to the effect that they are unable to determine that the income is sufficient. I'm still questioning the stated income total and why/how the foreign spouse's income is being included. It seems the initial review missed the schedule C, but adding a schedule C would not change the "total income" number on the tax return.
-
If that is a direct it is not the standard message that can often be ignored. Maybe it's an interpretation instead of a quote. However, the DQ message would be legit. I'm confused, in that there seems to three incomes being counted, petitioner, petitioner's child and the foreign spouse beneficiary. Is the beneficiary's income going to continue from the same source once they are in the USA?