McCann Parents Named as Suspects..

[featherB 1]

Here is an interesting article about the case.

Thanks, Mags. That is an interesting read...

[Captain Oates 910]

I think the dog that pointed out the smell of dead body should be demoted from deputy dawg to erroneous dawg

It should also be charged with wasting police time and causing thousands of media mawks to go to Portugal thus cancelling out all carbon savings made by david cameron and his family. That is possible under Portuguese law as I understand it from a report in the SUN summarised on cnn

My question is this - do lie detectors work on dawgs ? perhaps that beach just wanted a reward treat

Any witness who testifies for an incentive is guilty of perverting the course of justice and this case should be transferred to North Korea

where a hot dawg is just that whether it is in hot pursuit or not

[Logres 0]

I'm not surprised, to be honest. Something has never rang true in this case, the parents always seemed, well, can't think of the correct word, but just "not right".

Agreed - I always sensed that there was at least something that the parents weren't mentioning, whatever that may be.

Hopefully that is way off the mark and the girl is found in good health.

[Captain Oates 910]

I'm not surprised, to be honest. Something has never rang true in this case, the parents always seemed, well, can't think of the correct word, but just "not right".

Agreed - I always sensed that there was at least something that the parents weren't mentioning, whatever that may be.

Hopefully that is way off the mark and the girl is found in good health.

There was something 'not quite right ' about the police dog too..

It sort of looked sideways and showed no emotion when somebody shouted 'cats !'

Everything 'looked right' when Tony Blair listed all the WMD's in Iraq so perhaps 'looking right' is not the decider when trying to figure out if something is true or not.

Donald Rumsfeld said there was nothing wrong with 'water boarding' suspects when the case was serious enough..

This is where you cover the subject's face with cling fiilm and hold them under water until they choke.

has anyone tried this on a dog and does it work ?

I am working as a temp at the RSPCA so would you send me an email there please...British public wouldn't stand for that treatment of a dog so it may not be workeable.

thanks

alan

[no name 1]

I'm not surprised, to be honest. Something has never rang true in this case, the parents always seemed, well, can't think of the correct word, but just "not right".

Agreed - I always sensed that there was at least something that the parents weren't mentioning, whatever that may be.

Hopefully that is way off the mark and the girl is found in good health.

There was something 'not quite right ' about the police dog too..

It sort of looked sideways and showed no emotion when somebody shouted 'cats !'

Everything 'looked right' when Tony Blair listed all the WMD's in Iraq so perhaps 'looking right' is not the decider when trying to figure out if something is true or not.

Donald Rumsfeld said there was nothing wrong with 'water boarding' suspects when the case was serious enough..

This is where you cover the subject's face with cling fiilm and hold them under water until they choke.

has anyone tried this on a dog and does it work ?

I am working as a temp at the RSPCA so would you send me an email there please...British public wouldn't stand for that treatment of a dog so it may not be workeable.

thanks

alan

:huh:

[Captain Oates 910]

:huh:

When this is all over they will be guilty or innocent

If they are guilty - those of you who said they were innocent will look stupid

If they are innocent - those of you who said they were guilty will look stupid

Only people who say that with only 10% of the facts being public knowleage, it is stupid to speculate , will be right either way.

The only person to lose their job will be the police dog that said quite clearly in a high pitch that only a british bobby can hear, that a decomposing body had been there

[Logres 0]

:huh:

When this is all over they will be guilty or innocent

If they are guilty - those of you who said they were innocent will look stupid

If they are innocent - those of you who said they were guilty will look stupid

Only people who say that with only 10% of the facts being public knowleage, it is stupid to speculate , will be right either way.

The only person to lose their job will be the police dog that said quite clearly in a high pitch that only a british bobby can hear, that a decomposing body had been there

Ironically, I think there is only one person making themselves look stupid right now.

[featherB 1]

When this is all over they will be guilty or innocent

If they are guilty - those of you who said they were innocent will look stupid

If they are innocent - those of you who said they were guilty will look stupid

Only people who say that with only 10% of the facts being public knowleage, it is stupid to speculate , will be right either way.

The only person to lose their job will be the police dog that said quite clearly in a high pitch that only a british bobby can hear, that a decomposing body had been there

Again with the misinterpretations about what people are saying. What's with the 'those of you who said...'? Has anyone here said they are guilty, or that the are innocent?! (Of what, incidentally? Oh yeah, 'murder', as you pointed out before). I don't believe they have. So why would anyone look 'stupid', whatever the outcome?

[Captain Oates 910]

:huh:

When this is all over they will be guilty or innocent

If they are guilty - those of you who said they were innocent will look stupid

If they are innocent - those of you who said they were guilty will look stupid

Only people who say that with only 10% of the facts being public knowleage, it is stupid to speculate , will be right either way.

The only person to lose their job will be the police dog that said quite clearly in a high pitch that only a british bobby can hear, that a decomposing body had been there

Ironically, I think there is only one person making themselves look stupid right now.

It would be easy for me to say 'I know but I forgive you' but I don't engage in one liner conversation of the grunt-grunt type so I won't.

I just think it's not fair to paint these people as villains because of their facial expressions and nor is it right to say they are innocent and they should not be suspects.

It just isn't fair to do either.

The 'public' really alarm me much of the time - check this out- this is why I don't like lynch mobs

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/901723.stm

anyway I have said what I had to say so I will leave you to keep discussing it and adding to everyone's understanding of the situation ...

alan

[no name 1]

Alan, if you posted complete thoughts in complete sentences, it might make for a better debate.

[featherB 1]

You and your straw men, Alan... first people were accusing the McCanns of murder, apparently, so you had to explain what murder is. Then we were all evidently claiming their innocence or guilt, as you so helpfully pointed out. And now we're a lynch mob, it seems.

Where has any of this happened? Oh... it hasn't, that's right. And nobody claimed to be furthering anyone's understanding of the case (how would we?), merely having a conversation about it. How dare we, eh?

[Mags 112]

I'm not surprised, to be honest. Something has never rang true in this case, the parents always seemed, well, can't think of the correct word, but just "not right".

Agreed - I always sensed that there was at least something that the parents weren't mentioning, whatever that may be.

Hopefully that is way off the mark and the girl is found in good health.

There was something 'not quite right ' about the police dog too..

It sort of looked sideways and showed no emotion when somebody shouted 'cats !'

Everything 'looked right' when Tony Blair listed all the WMD's in Iraq so perhaps 'looking right' is not the decider when trying to figure out if something is true or not.

Donald Rumsfeld said there was nothing wrong with 'water boarding' suspects when the case was serious enough..

This is where you cover the subject's face with cling fiilm and hold them under water until they choke.

has anyone tried this on a dog and does it work ?

I am working as a temp at the RSPCA so would you send me an email there please...British public wouldn't stand for that treatment of a dog so it may not be workeable.

thanks

alan

It is just an impression that I get regarding the mother, that's all. Maybe it is guilt over Madeline (if indeed she was murdered by accident), maybe it is grief over the loss of her daughter. Maybe it is both. *shrugs* I don't know, but something does still not ring quite true about it all.

I'm hardly condemning the woman to death or picking apart her personality or nature.

:huh:

When this is all over they will be guilty or innocent

If they are guilty - those of you who said they were innocent will look stupid

If they are innocent - those of you who said they were guilty will look stupid

Only people who say that with only 10% of the facts being public knowleage, it is stupid to speculate , will be right either way.

The only person to lose their job will be the police dog that said quite clearly in a high pitch that only a british bobby can hear, that a decomposing body had been there

No one is going to look stupid...why? Because this is a discussion board, not a court of law. People are here discussing their views on this matter and whatever we say or think here will have no effect on the outcome of the Madeline case.

We are ALL entitled to our opinions here and it is perfectly acceptable to speculate.

Edited September 13, 2007 by Mags

[Logres 0]

:huh:

When this is all over they will be guilty or innocent

If they are guilty - those of you who said they were innocent will look stupid

If they are innocent - those of you who said they were guilty will look stupid

Only people who say that with only 10% of the facts being public knowleage, it is stupid to speculate , will be right either way.

The only person to lose their job will be the police dog that said quite clearly in a high pitch that only a british bobby can hear, that a decomposing body had been there

Ironically, I think there is only one person making themselves look stupid right now.

It would be easy for me to say 'I know but I forgive you' but I don't engage in one liner conversation of the grunt-grunt type so I won't.

I just think it's not fair to paint these people as villains because of their facial expressions and nor is it right to say they are innocent and they should not be suspects.

It just isn't fair to do either.

The 'public' really alarm me much of the time - check this out- this is why I don't like lynch mobs

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/901723.stm

anyway I have said what I had to say so I will leave you to keep discussing it and adding to everyone's understanding of the situation ...

alan

I didn't paint anyone out as a villian, it might have been one of the voices in your head that said that.

[Captain Oates 910]

Alan, if you posted complete thoughts in complete sentences, it might make for a better debate.

What don't you understand devil ? How can I make it clearer ? I don't post one sentence and sit back like some.

The last two posts that were not mine have been 'one liners'. Who else is debating ?

The thread was getting distinctly 'big brotherish' and needed some law and facts and concepts of fairness injecting and that's what I did.

I go into my reasons... you know, fairness etc ?

It's a bit rich to be accused of doing 'incomplete sentences' in one sentence by one of the single sentence contributors !

If you want to go back to 'she only shed one tear today and that's not normal' then fine carry one in that vein but it isnt much of a debate (in my opinion). I promise not to contribute to it coz I don't watch soap operas ..alan

[PaulineA 1]

The only "fairness" is investigating in to the cause of the little girls death. If that means questioning the parents, then so be it.