Jump to content
David Young

K-1 Filing Requirement

 Share

21 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Country: Jamaica
Timeline

Wow....great thread. Anyone know what happened to them? Did they eventually get the visa?

I met Andre while still married. My divorce was a long and overly stressful process. I got the final decree about a month and a half before we filed the K-1. No issue was made of it nor did any additional proof have to be shown.

Life's just a crazy ride on a run away train

You can't go back for what you've missed

So make it count, hold on tight find a way to make it right

You only get one trip

So make it good, make it last 'cause it all flies by so fast

You only get one trip

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are a variety of reasons why people don't get their final "divorce decree" immediately after seperation. In my case, I had a legal seperation from my ex-husband in 2000. We could not progress further with the divorce due to financial disagreements. We went back and forth between each other, then lawyers, set pre-trial dates etc. In the interim, I was dating my now husband Gene. I ended up getting a "divorce", and my "decree" in 2004. We ended up attending mediation, and in lieu of a trial, I cut my losses and agreed to a final financial agreement which was then filed with the court. Since this has occurred, in Saskatchewan anyway, you cannot get a divorce now until all your financial arrangments and dispersment of properties has been agreed to.

Anyway, on my applications to USCIS and my interviews thus far, I have always included in paperwork that my divorce was final in 2004 albeit property settlement, and that Gene and I began dating in 2002. I've never been questioned, or had eyebrows raised. It is ridiculous to believe that anyone would question the length of time seeing someone new, and the date of your divorce.

Carla (F)

carlahmsb4.gif
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: Jamaica
Timeline
There are a variety of reasons why people don't get their final "divorce decree" immediately after seperation. In my case, I had a legal seperation from my ex-husband in 2000. We could not progress further with the divorce due to financial disagreements. We went back and forth between each other, then lawyers, set pre-trial dates etc. In the interim, I was dating my now husband Gene. I ended up getting a "divorce", and my "decree" in 2004. We ended up attending mediation, and in lieu of a trial, I cut my losses and agreed to a final financial agreement which was then filed with the court. Since this has occurred, in Saskatchewan anyway, you cannot get a divorce now until all your financial arrangments and dispersment of properties has been agreed to.

Anyway, on my applications to USCIS and my interviews thus far, I have always included in paperwork that my divorce was final in 2004 albeit property settlement, and that Gene and I began dating in 2002. I've never been questioned, or had eyebrows raised. It is ridiculous to believe that anyone would question the length of time seeing someone new, and the date of your divorce.

Carla (F)

Yes, I am in agreement with this.

However, you still cannot file the paperwork until you are both free to marry. Regardless of any other reasoning, you are not free to marry while a divorce is pending. So, the answer to the original question is, you have to wait till the divorce is official before you can file for the K-1.

Life's just a crazy ride on a run away train

You can't go back for what you've missed

So make it count, hold on tight find a way to make it right

You only get one trip

So make it good, make it last 'cause it all flies by so fast

You only get one trip

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Romania
Timeline

I filed for divorse and as soon as i had a copy of it in my hot lil hands i filed the K1, ofcorse id been trying to divorse my ex husband for 10 yrs, so its not like Edi broke my marriage, but i did no revisit him after the divorse was final and before filing the K1 as i had just had our son. Either way i was approved. so im having a hard time understanding why the OP is being told to go revisit after the divorse papers are final

There are a variety of reasons why people don't get their final "divorce decree" immediately after seperation. In my case, I had a legal seperation from my ex-husband in 2000. We could not progress further with the divorce due to financial disagreements. We went back and forth between each other, then lawyers, set pre-trial dates etc. In the interim, I was dating my now husband Gene. I ended up getting a "divorce", and my "decree" in 2004. We ended up attending mediation, and in lieu of a trial, I cut my losses and agreed to a final financial agreement which was then filed with the court. Since this has occurred, in Saskatchewan anyway, you cannot get a divorce now until all your financial arrangments and dispersment of properties has been agreed to.

Anyway, on my applications to USCIS and my interviews thus far, I have always included in paperwork that my divorce was final in 2004 albeit property settlement, and that Gene and I began dating in 2002. I've never been questioned, or had eyebrows raised. It is ridiculous to believe that anyone would question the length of time seeing someone new, and the date of your divorce.

Carla (F)

Yes, I am in agreement with this.

However, you still cannot file the paperwork until you are both free to marry. Regardless of any other reasoning, you are not free to marry while a divorce is pending. So, the answer to the original question is, you have to wait till the divorce is official before you can file for the K-1.

and i agree with this statement 10000%!!!

Me and Edi were together as of May 2000 and my divorse was finally final on July 2005. I went back and forth as well between lawyers and getting the SOB to actually sign the papers. but i was never and edi was never questioned on this at all

Edited by Ionescu

vj2.jpgvj.jpg

"VJ Timelines are only an estimate, they are not actual approval dates! They only reflect VJ members. VJ Timelines do not include the thousands of applicants who do not use VJ"

IF YOU ARE NEW TO THE SITE, PLEASE READ THE GUIDES BEFORE ASKING ALOT OF QUESTIONS. THE GUIDES ARE VERY HELPFUL AND WILL SAVE YOU ALOT OF TIME!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: China
Timeline
There are a variety of reasons why people don't get their final "divorce decree" immediately after seperation. In my case, I had a legal seperation from my ex-husband in 2000. We could not progress further with the divorce due to financial disagreements. We went back and forth between each other, then lawyers, set pre-trial dates etc. In the interim, I was dating my now husband Gene. I ended up getting a "divorce", and my "decree" in 2004. We ended up attending mediation, and in lieu of a trial, I cut my losses and agreed to a final financial agreement which was then filed with the court. Since this has occurred, in Saskatchewan anyway, you cannot get a divorce now until all your financial arrangments and dispersment of properties has been agreed to.

Anyway, on my applications to USCIS and my interviews thus far, I have always included in paperwork that my divorce was final in 2004 albeit property settlement, and that Gene and I began dating in 2002. I've never been questioned, or had eyebrows raised. It is ridiculous to believe that anyone would question the length of time seeing someone new, and the date of your divorce.

Carla (F)

It may well be ridiculous for anyone to question these issues in your circumstances, but I'm not conjecturing. Consular Officers in Guangzhou routinely suspect visa fraud when the USC's divorce was within months of the couple's first meeting and petition filing. They do so because the see a lot of this kind of fraud. Of course quite often the couple (legitimate or not) jumps through the hoops and gets the visa. The most common hoop is to provide evidence of the current residence and wherabouts of any and sometimes all former spouses.

A good friend I made during my second visit to China was going the K1 route. It turns out his initial visit and engagement was a few weeks prior to the Chinese woman's date of final divorce decree. This was a misunderstanding. She thought the divorce was final but when the actual papers were examined the date on the decree was after the visit and engagement. They were blue slipped and had to provide overcome information that included a statement from him about why he came to visit and pursue a relationship with a married woman. They were able to overcome the initial denial but her arrival was delayed about 75 days. That was this time last year. Now its taking about three months from initial interview until an appointment date to submit overcome evidence in Guangzhou.

So, again, as ridiculous as it sounds, this couple needs to be prepared to explain the timing of their relationship, not from a moralistic eyebrow raising standpoint but to satisfy the Consulate they aren't involved in a very common form of visa fraud.

Facts are cheap...knowing how to use them is precious...
Understanding the big picture is priceless. Anonymous

Google Who is Pushbrk?

A Warning to Green Card Holders About Voting

http://www.visajourney.com/forums/topic/606646-a-warning-to-green-card-holders-about-voting/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay, I know I'm not a K-1, but something very similar happened to me. As part of my RFE, I had to provide details on when my relationship with my first husband ended as my decree absolute was handed down only 11 days before my wedding. (Classy!) I explained that the ex ended it and I moved out of our house four months before I met Bruce, and that my ex was very happy I had found someone to love me again. I was a little miffed about having to do this, because I thought what business is it of theirs whether I was still technically married (although separated) when I was out there dating -- it's not like Bruce is a homewrecker. Then I remembered: oh yes, this is USCIS we're dealing with and EVERYTHING is their business. :angry:

So it's not just confined to China -- even "low-risk" countries like the UK can throw up issues like this.

Edited by elmcitymaven

larissa-lima-says-who-is-against-the-que

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...