Fiancee visa denied Phnom Penh

[Mogambi 96]

Hiring a lawyer might not be a bad idea for an appeal, as a lawyer (I believe) can actually accompany you to the appeal and speak on your behalf. BUT you need to check on that.

I just don't agree with the others here that sending your fiancé money could possibly be a red flag. Almost all of us here have sent money to our fiancé's abroad and most guides talk about sending in money remittences as evidence of a relationship. I struggle to see how that could possibly be seen as a red flag. Since the point of the I-34 is to show that you are capable of supporting your fiancé when he/she comes over, how is starting to help support them before they get here a bad thing?

Someone explain how that can be a red flag.

[NY_BX 397]

This is the nightmare that I am afraid of. They never came out and say what they were lookiung for so we can be prepared. Sorry Dude.

Why? It's the USC sending money, not the other way around.

A lot of overseas scammers ask for money; their intention is live off of a USC bank account and not to actually migrate to the US. Those that do migrate, end up building a bank account in their home countries for their families.

[Sayha or bust. 71]

Red Flag must be there. From what you told us here, it seems to be OK. But there must be something more. Filing again without knowing the reason for refusal would not help. I know it's tough.

For god sake, if they refuse my wife visa I would fly and live there for 6 months and do DCF.

What if the petitioner has kids here in the states, you still think that would be a good idea? Most people with stable jobs and strong ties(Kids) back here in the states wouldn't do that. I love my now wife immensely and if we would of got denied I would of made a few more trips over there and do a Cr-1 like most of the Vjer's here are suggesting. Remember you have to be able to support you wife if you ever come back.

[Boiler 45,402]

Hmmm

I was never sent any money, did I miss out?

[Sayha or bust. 71]

Hmmm

I was never sent any money, did I miss out?

Did you need to learn english, come from a 3rd world country? I don' t think Wales fits in either category.

Edited June 7, 2012 by Sayha or bust.

[Boiler 45,402]

Mae hi'n siared trwy ei het

Daffyd

[rade2rising 205]

hmmm sad to read when legit couples get denied. the system is failing the honest ppl...

[Sayha or bust. 71]

Mae hi'n siared trwy ei het

Daffyd

Old Welsh saying. Point being is his fiancee could be paying a tutor for English, and even quit her job to stay home and learn it. This was my experience and I'm sure I'm not alone.

Edited June 8, 2012 by Sayha or bust.

[ChetT 9]

I don't see sending money is a red flag. I asked my wife to quit her job and she agreed. I fully support her. The reverse would be a red flag. What on earth would the CO care if I send my wife money ?

[Chicagoguy 2 27]

If you do get an attorney make sure they have good experience in immigration law.

[charlie1 4]

well,something is missing here,

its mentioned the word husband and wife here,

I don't think it's the money transfer or the age is the red flag,

even the CO might have a girlfriend or wife or a fiancee and they spend money on them,as we know,in America the guy who spends money on women,

if your fiancee over seas wouldn't you send her money to buy her self something? like a pant's or shirt,or makeup?????????

whose going to pay for the embassy expansive over seas???for sure the USC,

it's shame on me to let my fiancee pay for it,come on,i send my fiancee some money,once and am going to send her again for the embassy forms and medical too,

is't wrong to do that??then ffffffffffff the CO

I would say you have to do something,don't stop there,at least know what the denial was for!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[eaglewest 9]

Did everyone read his post in the beginning? the reason for denial is that the CO doesn't believe his fiancee's love for him is genuine and that the intention is to immigrate to the US.

[Alaan 0]

Sorry to hear about the denial.

However, I found something odd in your description of what happened; and it's this: "she couldn't issue her a visa cause she didn't believe my fiancee love for me was genuine that my fiancee only want to immigrate to the US not cause she love me. She told me i can either re-apply for K-1 visa petition for her again or get marry and do the marry petition

Why would the CO recommend/say to re-file or get married to someone they already found to be fraudulent towards you?

[charlie1 4]

Sorry to hear about the denial.

However, I found something odd in your description of what happened; and it's this: "she couldn't issue her a visa cause she didn't believe my fiancee love for me was genuine that my fiancee only want to immigrate to the US not cause she love me. She told me i can either re-apply for K-1 visa petition for her again or get marry and do the marry petition

Why would the CO recommend/say to re-file or get married to someone they already found to be fraudulent towards you?

that's right

[Boiler 45,402]

There was no recommendation, just stated a legal fact.

OT I must admit that expecting your SO to leave his or her job seems weird to me.

Back in the day it was common that women who were teachers etc had to give up their job when they married, but that was 100 years ago.