Jump to content
Steve and Poy

On K1 does birth father need to ok?

 Share

14 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Country: Thailand
Timeline

I found out the hard way that the US Consulate, in opposition to Thai law, and in (in my opinion) opposition to American Law demand that the birth father of a child, regardless if the mother hall all rights and the father has none under Thai law, even if male/female were never married, and even if the father has not contributed to the support of the child, or had contact since birth he still MUST agree to allow the child to leave Thailand. Absent that, no visa will be issued until the child becomes an adult.

Short Thai story: Father refused, end of K1.

Does this same situation relate to a Philippine woman who has a certificate of singleness (or whatever it is called) or a woman whose husband has abandoned the mother/child, or has not been in contact, or supportive, even for a decade?

Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Australia
Timeline

I found out the hard way that the US Consulate, in opposition to Thai law, and in (in my opinion) opposition to American Law demand that the birth father of a child, regardless if the mother hall all rights and the father has none under Thai law, even if male/female were never married, and even if the father has not contributed to the support of the child, or had contact since birth he still MUST agree to allow the child to leave Thailand. Absent that, no visa will be issued until the child becomes an adult.

Short Thai story: Father refused, end of K1.

Does this same situation relate to a Philippine woman who has a certificate of singleness (or whatever it is called) or a woman whose husband has abandoned the mother/child, or has not been in contact, or supportive, even for a decade?

Thanks

You can get a court order showing sole custody and that should be sufficient as well. Your situation must not be contrary to Thai law though because the follow the law of the country in this regard.

In the Philippines if you're single and never married the father then the father doesn't need to give permission. However I think that marriage is a different kettle of fish.

I suggest you explore the court order option.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-3 Visa Country: Thailand
Timeline

You can get a court order showing sole custody and that should be sufficient as well. Your situation must not be contrary to Thai law though because the follow the law of the country in this regard.

In the Philippines if you're single and never married the father then the father doesn't need to give permission. However I think that marriage is a different kettle of fish.

I suggest you explore the court order option.

In two cases that I know of the Thai court order was rejected by the embassy. Below is a copy of a message the embassy sent to one person after they tired to use the court order & other info.

"We normally discuss these issues in person when people come for their interview. Applicants are generally able to satisfy the documentary requirements for immigrant visas without hiring an attorney. The normal requirement is to provide an affidavit of consent to emigrate, using our language, that can be executed by the biological parent either at the district office or at the embassy. Usually biological parents can be tracked down, such as through the grandparents. In the absence of a court document stating that only one parent has custody, we generally require that parent to make every possible effort to contact the absent parent before we will consider other possibilities. These children are not very old and one of them has had recent contact with the biological father, so we encourage your fiancée to make every effort to contact the father to have him swear the affidavit of consent".

In this case the mother wasnt able to find the father even after an incredible effort was put into trying. The embassy would not issue the visa & the children remain in Thailand today. The fathers contact, support ect doesnt have any thing to do with the embassies position. They simply dont care to even hear it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Australia
Timeline

In two cases that I know of the Thai court order was rejected by the embassy. Below is a copy of a message the embassy sent to one person after they tired to use the court order & other info.

"We normally discuss these issues in person when people come for their interview. Applicants are generally able to satisfy the documentary requirements for immigrant visas without hiring an attorney. The normal requirement is to provide an affidavit of consent to emigrate, using our language, that can be executed by the biological parent either at the district office or at the embassy. Usually biological parents can be tracked down, such as through the grandparents. In the absence of a court document stating that only one parent has custody, we generally require that parent to make every possible effort to contact the absent parent before we will consider other possibilities. These children are not very old and one of them has had recent contact with the biological father, so we encourage your fiancée to make every effort to contact the father to have him swear the affidavit of consent".

In this case the mother wasnt able to find the father even after an incredible effort was put into trying. The embassy would not issue the visa & the children remain in Thailand today. The fathers contact, support ect doesnt have any thing to do with the embassies position. They simply dont care to even hear it.

In your own quote it states "in the absence of a court order stating that only one parent has custody..." which means a court order is sufficient.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vanessa&Tony, the quoted part from Ning's response is from the embassy in Bangkok about a case in the past. They pretty much want the father in his language say he gives the mother the right to take their child/children out of the country. It is sad it is like that especially for the kids whose father was never in the kids life.

OP I wish you the best.

AOS Journey

11-04-2011 sent AOS to Chicago lockbox

11-07-2011 delivered

11-08-2011 Date on text messages but did not receive until 11-22-2011

11-23-2011 Check cashed.

11-25-2011 Hard copies of NOA1s

12-06-2012 Pui's Brother unexpectly passes away and we make an info pass appointment and receive an emergancy AP so she can return home. Pui leaves for Thailand for 2 weeks.

12-06-2012 Get a text message and email that she received an RFE

12-12-2012 RFE for original birth certificate. I swear we sent it along with a certificate translation of it.

12-20-2012 Pui returns from Thailand.

12-21-2012 We send the RFE back for with original birth certificate along with a new certificate of translation(I had to wait for her to return for her to sign)

12-26-2012 text and email they have received the RFE.

12-29-2012 Appointment for biometrics is 01-23-2012

01-13-2012 AP is approved.

01-23-2012 Biometrics appointment. Later during the evening the text and email saying the EAD is approved.

01-31-2012 EAD/AP combo card arrives.

05-22-2012 Email and text card is in production!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Australia
Timeline

Vanessa&Tony, the quoted part from Ning's response is from the embassy in Bangkok about a case in the past. They pretty much want the father in his language say he gives the mother the right to take their child/children out of the country. It is sad it is like that especially for the kids whose father was never in the kids life.

OP I wish you the best.

YOU'RE MISSING THE POINT!! The OP's quote shows that a COURT ORDER is sufficient and in cases where the father was "never in the kids life" (as you stated) a court order would be what I would be obtaining AND is sufficient evidence for USCIS. Also easier than tracking down a father that's not interested.

Whether it's an old case or not it still shows a COURT ORDER is accepted. It also shows that obviously the person that was denied did not have a court order that stated SOLE custody, or a letter from the parent. If you have a link to the case I would be happy to read it in context.

Edited by Vanessa&Tony
Link to comment
Share on other sites

YOU'RE MISSING THE POINT!! The OP's quote shows that a COURT ORDER is sufficient and in cases where the father was "never in the kids life" (as you stated) a court order would be what I would be obtaining AND is sufficient evidence for USCIS. Also easier than tracking down a father that's not interested.

Whether it's an old case or not it still shows a COURT ORDER is accepted. It also shows that obviously the person that was denied did not have a court order that stated SOLE custody, or a letter from the parent. If you have a link to the case I would be happy to read it in context.

I concur on the court order. We obtained one and had no difficulty getting visas for the children to come to the USA. Actually it was a lot easier than trying to deal with a dead beat dad.

Edited by Mountain Climber
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Australia
Timeline

I concur on the court order. We obtained one and had no difficulty getting visas for the children to come to the USA.

THANKYOU!!

OP I suggest you speak to this person and ask them specifically what the court order stated and what they had to ask for so you know what to get. All is not lost!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-3 Visa Country: Thailand
Timeline

You want to marry a child? :wacko:

I don't think you will have any better luck in the Philippines.

You might even go to jail if the father presses charges.

Sir the gentleman and his wife want to bring her child with them and the Father of the child is not making himself available.

Your comment was off topic and insensitive to the couples issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline

I found out the hard way that the US Consulate, in opposition to Thai law, and in (in my opinion) opposition to American Law demand that the birth father of a child, regardless if the mother hall all rights and the father has none under Thai law, even if male/female were never married, and even if the father has not contributed to the support of the child, or had contact since birth he still MUST agree to allow the child to leave Thailand. Absent that, no visa will be issued until the child becomes an adult.

Short Thai story: Father refused, end of K1.

Does this same situation relate to a Philippine woman who has a certificate of singleness (or whatever it is called) or a woman whose husband has abandoned the mother/child, or has not been in contact, or supportive, even for a decade?

Thanks

Under Philippine law, out of wedlock children are under FULL custody of the mother. No need for fathers' permission. However, when taking a minor out of the country, you will need a DSWD permit if the child is not travelling with the mother

But that is Philippine law, not Thai law

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-3 Visa Country: Thailand
Timeline

In your own quote it states "in the absence of a court order stating that only one parent has custody..." which means a court order is sufficient.

Thanks for letting me know what it says. Inspite of what it says & what you say the embassy officer that made the determination in this case didnt know you were in charge. Please let them know right away that you want these decisions made as you say they should.

In the case I sited I assure you for what ever reason they would not accept the court order. The mother is in the USA at this moment without her children after several attempts to get the kids visa. She spent 3 thousand dollars on lawyers to help her obtain the court order. It was rejected by the embassy. Twice. Even after they said in the message I copied here what you point out. I know what it says & I know what happened.

Below is the second responce from the embassy on the same case sent after she tried again to get them to issue the visa using the court order.

" Thank you for your response. We again must state that we can’t provide any individuals with specific advice about their situations, but that most applicants discuss the situation with us at their interviews to determine the best way to proceed, and that most applicants do not need to have lawyers. Most applicants don’t qualify for a visa at the time of the interview anyway, and have to come for follow-up, which is no problem as long the follow-up takes place within a year of the interview. So, you may wish to postpone your decision to incur significant legal fees and again, have your fiancée focus for now on any other ways she might be able to contact the biological father".

Again this is a quote from the BKK embassy. It was fair warning & they meant what they said. They refused to issue the visas even when presented with the court order.

Next we see Mountian climber was able to get the visa using the court order. I am sorry that I wasnt able to go over every case ever decided on the subject.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline

Sir the gentleman and his wife want to bring her child with them and the Father of the child is not making himself available.

Your comment was off topic and insensitive to the couples issue.

On K1 does birth father need to ok?

Short Thai story: Father refused, end of K1.

How is my post irrelevant to the question posted?

N.B. Perhaps a mod could clean up this thread and move it to the appropriate forum. The OP has nothing to do with the Philippines, unless he is considering shopping for a bride with children there.

Edited by Crusty Old Perv
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...