My fience was denied

[Oneness 17]

On the f-129 form there was only room for two divorses so I put down my first wifes divorsed in 1985 and my third wife 2008 Idid not declare my second wife and the divorse in 2004 what do i do

[Robert&Karen 264]

Similar issue here. I wrote SEE ATTACHED in the spot and on an additional sheet of paper wrote the number I was explaining, then (continued) then the information they wanted.

But surely she was not denied because you had three marriages?

Edited September 13, 2011 by aorobert

[Inky 1,110]

You made it all the way to the interview and were denied at the interview for not disclosing all previous marriages?

[Operator 1,927]

What was the reason for denial? (Should be on the sheet given to the beneficiary)

[Oneness 17]

You made it all the way to the interview and were denied at the interview for not disclosing all previous marriages?

That what she said. She new the divorse date so they new i waa not married

What was the reason for denial? (Should be on the sheet given to the beneficiary)

I don't know she called me this morning and now she is not answering her phone

[Inky 1,110]

Did you/she provide a copy of all the divorce papers? even for the one you didn't list on the forms?

[Operator 1,927]

Did you petition for any of your previous wives?

[Robert&Karen 264]

Did you petition for any of your previous wives?

This is a good question and the only time I could see marriages being an issue.

[Harsh_77 718]

On the f-129 form there was only room for two divorses so I put down my first wifes divorsed in 1985 and my third wife 2008 Idid not declare my second wife and the divorse in 2004 what do i do

I don’t know if your denial is related to you not disclosing the facts or it was due to some other reason.

I can say you did not read the instruction before filling out the form, as it says if there is not enough space on the form to use blank piece of paper and include all the details.

[Oneness 17]

I don't know the reason, this should have went strieght through.

If there was any problen like a dicloser that was easy to find

they had a record of the 2004 divorse I would have thought they would

have let me know. I thought i was covering my bases when i put down

the first and third

.

[Oneness 17]

I would have had no reason to petition any of my past wives

[Boiler 45,402]

I am usually not a supporters of lawyers, but this may be the exception.

[Oneness 17]

I am in shock ... I am shattered ... I no she was begining to have cold feet the last two weeks so that is running through my head to

[Harsh_77 718]

I don't know the reason, this should have went strieght through.

If there was any problen like a dicloser that was easy to find

they had a record of the 2004 divorse I would have thought they would

have let me know. I thought i was covering my bases when i put down

the first and third

.

Why you think this should have gone thru?

When any item not disclosed and found out by USCIS they would not let that case just slide by.

They would do more digging as why all the details were not completely disclosed, why is applicant not completely disclosing every details.

[Operator 1,927]

I would have had no reason to petition any of my past wives

Your answer leads me to believe that you didn't understand my question (sorry if I am wrong). I'll ask it a different way. So none of your ex's were born in another country and came to the US on a visa for which you were the petitioner?