Jump to content
jsnearline

New IMBRA Restrictions on Petitions Make Sense

 Share

63 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Country: Philippines
Timeline

Unfortunately for us, we were processed in the fall of 2004, before Manila started posting interview schedules online. We had no choice but to call the Embassy call center for info.

08/28/2004 Engaged

09/22/2004 I-129F submitted

10/01/2004 I-129F Approved

12/15/2004 K1 Issued

12/30/2004 Arrival in US

02/19/2005 Married

01/30/2006 Conditional Green Card Approved

01/15/2008 Conditions Removed and 10 Year Card Issued

03/28/2009 N-400 mailed to Lockbox

07/17/2009 Interview Denver USCIS office RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL

08/28/2009 Naturalization Ceremony - US District Court - Denver, Colorado[/b][/u]

09/04/2009 Applied for passport

09/22/2009 Passport approved and mailed

09/24/2009 Passport received

08/26/2009 Naturalization Certificate and Name Change Petition arrive back from State Department

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: China
Timeline
I can understand the frustration people feel about how this law has been implemented and the impact it has had on their current petitions. That said, I think the new limits on K1 petition filings make very good sense.

I've read posts in the past on VJ that sound like some people see the K visa process like shopping for something at the mall. If it doesn't work out with this one, no problem. I'll just go shopping for another one. People say they should be able to marry anyone they want, however many times they want, and the government shouldn't interfere. What they don't take into account is that when a US Citizen marries a foreign national, they are putting that person on the fast track to Citizenship. Bringing a fiancée to the US is a privilege and the government has a valid interest in ensuring that our immigration system is not abused.

Why shouldn't there be a limit on the number of petitions you can file? If a petitioner knows that their number of K petitions is limited, I would think it would be incentive to be extra careful, especially the second time around.

What is so unreasonable about having to wait two years after having the first K1 approved before applying for a second? If you get burned the first time around, why be so anxious to rush in the second time. This restriction allows time for some soul searching and reflection. This may not have been the purpose of the law, but it is a good side effect in my humble opinion.

Hate to burst Your Bubble guy but ask the Government why they harrass innocent men and women that want to be together and Why do they coddle the illegals which some are indeed Criminals, They give them benefits and more, what part of Illegal immigrant don't You understand :bonk:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (pnd) Country: Mexico
Timeline
Listen people. My big problem with everything that has gone on with IMRA is the total lack of common sense in the implimentation and application of the the new Law. I worked for the State Of Ct. for a couple of years. It's the same way there... People on the top make a decision based in a good idea but wont contact and discuss it with the poor SOB's who must enforce the new decision. That's all.

I just believe that too much Governmental controll Slows Efficiency that's all. George Washington, Ben Franklin, Thomas Jefferson and even Thomas Payne agree with me on that point.

"A necessary Evil in it's best form, an Intollerable Evil in it's worst form." :yes:

Sorry about the Politics!

It just frosts me when people just accept the nonsense the Gov. hands out on a daily basis.

Enouph Politics?

:dance:

Anybody want a Beer? B)

Yes, a beer sounds good right now! May the process move on for all of us affected by the incompetence of the USCIS. And may people that want to discuss politics move to off topic. As for politics, I also agree with you. The more steps they add to this process, the longer it will take; this is the one aspect of this new legislation that the people who created it basically ignored.

In my opinion, this issue has been discussed to death, RIP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...