Jump to content
dfouts

US citizen with UK spouse

 Share

10 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Timeline

This is our situation. I (US citizen) married a UK citizen over a year ago and went through the visa process to get a UK visa and moved to Scotland. I lived there with my husband for 8 months when we recently came to the US to visit. We want to stay here and get a US visa for him to stay. Can this be done from the US? He entered on a tourist visa and is within the 90 day stay. Can/should I file a I-130 petition now with the I-864? Help!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Canada
Timeline

If you entered with the intent on visiting and not staying, you may file the I-130 and the I-145 to adjust status.

Read the guides, wonderful place to begin your journey

Good luck

USCIS
August 12, 2008 - petition sent
August 16, 2008 - NOA-1
February 10, 2009 - NOA-2
178 DAYS FROM NOA-1


NVC
February 13, 2009 - NVC case number assigned
March 12, 2009 - Case Complete
25 DAY TRIP THROUGH NVC


Medical
May 4, 2009


Interview
May, 26, 2009


POE - June 20, 2009 Toronto - Atlanta, GA

Removal of Conditions
Filed - April 14, 2011
Biometrics - June 2, 2011 (early)
Approval - November 9, 2011
209 DAY TRIP TO REMOVE CONDITIONS

Citizenship

April 29, 2013 - NOA1 for petition received

September 10, 2013 Interview - decision could not be made.

April 15, 2014 APPROVED. Wait for oath ceremony

Waited...

September 29, 2015 - sent letter to senator.

October 16, 2015 - US Citizen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, it would take less time if you just went back to the UK and went through DCF. We filed the I-130 in April, and now we are just waiting on the interview. Takes a lot less time to DCF than it does to go through the process in the States.

08-Nov-2004----Met in Kuwait

23-Dec-2004----Started Dating

14-Jun-2008----Got Married

08-Apr-2009----Sent I-130 to London Embassy

16-Apr-2009----Credit Card Charged

16-Apr-2009----Received NOA1 by email

11-May-2009----Embassy Website shows they are Processing Applications filed on 16 April 2009 Wahoo!!!

18-May-2009----Embassy Website shows they are Processing Applications filed on 16 April 2009, What did they all go on holiday???

28-May-2009----4 RFE's Lots of information required sending tomorrow.

28-May-2009----Embassy Website shows they are Processing Applications filed on 01 May 2009

08-June-2009---NOA2 Wahoo!!!!!!!

11-June-2009---Received Hard Copy NOA2

13-June-2009---Received Packet 3

15-June-2009---Returned Packet 3

17-June-2009---Embassy Received Packet 3, Signed for by KOKO

25-June-2009---Received email from Embassy for Appointment date

26-June-2009---Called and rescheduled Medical from 7 July 2009 to 1 July 2009

01-July-2009---Medical---New Date

07-July-2009---Interview----APPROVED Pending Police Certificate

07-July-2009----Medical---Rescheduled

15-July-2009----SMS Collected Documents

17-July-2009----Delivered to Embassy

21-July-2009----Visa Processed/Put in Passport

23-July-2009----Visa Delivered

23-July-2009----Husband does the "I have a VISA" happy dance!!

26-July-2009-----Holiday in Wales for 2 weeks.

event.png

"Everyday is something special. I am blessed to be able to share it with my husband."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You'll also probably have an uphill battle proving that when your spouse came to the U.S. with you it was just for a visit since you're already married...

Naturalization

N-400 package mailed: 04/16/2013

N-400 package delivered: 04/16/2013

NOA1 date: 04/17/2013

Biometrics: 08/23/2013

Interview: 10/07/2013

Oath: 01/23/2014

DONE!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
This is our situation. I (US citizen) married a UK citizen over a year ago and went through the visa process to get a UK visa and moved to Scotland. I lived there with my husband for 8 months when we recently came to the US to visit. We want to stay here and get a US visa for him to stay. Can this be done from the US? He entered on a tourist visa and is within the 90 day stay. Can/should I file a I-130 petition now with the I-864? Help!

If you are both in the US right now, the smartest move would be to consult with an immigration attorney, in private, about YOUR specific situation.

In most cases, it's not a problem for your husband to apply to Adjust Status. Now you need to go find out if that is so for *your* case.

Now That You Are A Permanent Resident

How Do I Remove The Conditions On Permanent Residence Based On Marriage?

Welcome to the United States: A Guide For New Immigrants

Yes, even this last one.. stuff in there that not even your USC knows.....

Here are more links that I love:

Arriving in America, The POE Drill

Dual Citizenship FAQ

Other Fora I Post To:

alt.visa.us.marriage-based http://britishexpats.com/ and www.***removed***.com

censored link = *family based immigration* website

Inertia. Is that the Greek god of 'can't be bothered'?

Met, married, immigrated, naturalized.

I-130 filed Aug02

USC Jul06

No Deje Piedras Sobre El Pavimento!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
Honestly, it would take less time if you just went back to the UK and went through DCF. We filed the I-130 in April, and now we are just waiting on the interview. Takes a lot less time to DCF than it does to go through the process in the States.

How can that be, when adjustment cases average less than 6 months and London DCF cases take about the same?

You'll also probably have an uphill battle proving that when your spouse came to the U.S. with you it was just for a visit since you're already married...

How can you base that from what was written and posted here? Marriage to a citizen carries a higher bar of immigrant intent, but this guy was admitted. People who live outside of the US are allowed to visit. As he's already in, I'd suggest he already did convince the border agent that he was here for a visit.

Now That You Are A Permanent Resident

How Do I Remove The Conditions On Permanent Residence Based On Marriage?

Welcome to the United States: A Guide For New Immigrants

Yes, even this last one.. stuff in there that not even your USC knows.....

Here are more links that I love:

Arriving in America, The POE Drill

Dual Citizenship FAQ

Other Fora I Post To:

alt.visa.us.marriage-based http://britishexpats.com/ and www.***removed***.com

censored link = *family based immigration* website

Inertia. Is that the Greek god of 'can't be bothered'?

Met, married, immigrated, naturalized.

I-130 filed Aug02

USC Jul06

No Deje Piedras Sobre El Pavimento!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You'll also probably have an uphill battle proving that when your spouse came to the U.S. with you it was just for a visit since you're already married...

How can you base that from what was written and posted here? Marriage to a citizen carries a higher bar of immigrant intent, but this guy was admitted. People who live outside of the US are allowed to visit. As he's already in, I'd suggest he already did convince the border agent that he was here for a visit.

Well it's not up to the person at his port of entry to adjust his status- it's up to the officer at USCIS to adjudicate it. We don't know, nor does that adjudicating officer know, what happened when he got off the plane. Maybe he never mentioned he was here with his wife. My husband has been here to visit me twice- once he told them he was here visiting his wife and the second time he wasn't asked any questions at all. Convincing the officer at the port of entry to let you in has nothing to do with having the petition approved and it would be unfortunate if they assumed they were good to go because of that.

AOS in this sense is usually utilized by couples who met or married spontaneously during a visit and even then it's not always easy going. Unless they can prove he had a return ticket, a job, a house and many more obligations to return to, I don't think any USCIS officer will buy that he came to the U.S. with his wife for a visit and just happened to decide to stay.

While it may be possible to do this, it is completely disregarding the visa processes we are all going through right now. If it were that simple we'd all have our spouses over on the VWP and circumvent all the necessary procedures. You're already lucky enough to be eligible for DCF. If I was in your situation I'd go back and follow that route rather than risk having the AOS denied and be out of options. Best of luck though guys.

Naturalization

N-400 package mailed: 04/16/2013

N-400 package delivered: 04/16/2013

NOA1 date: 04/17/2013

Biometrics: 08/23/2013

Interview: 10/07/2013

Oath: 01/23/2014

DONE!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
You'll also probably have an uphill battle proving that when your spouse came to the U.S. with you it was just for a visit since you're already married...

How can you base that from what was written and posted here? Marriage to a citizen carries a higher bar of immigrant intent, but this guy was admitted. People who live outside of the US are allowed to visit. As he's already in, I'd suggest he already did convince the border agent that he was here for a visit.

Well it's not up to the person at his port of entry to adjust his status- it's up to the officer at USCIS to adjudicate it. We don't know, nor does that adjudicating officer know, what happened when he got off the plane. Maybe he never mentioned he was here with his wife. My husband has been here to visit me twice- once he told them he was here visiting his wife and the second time he wasn't asked any questions at all. Convincing the officer at the port of entry to let you in has nothing to do with having the petition approved and it would be unfortunate if they assumed they were good to go because of that.

It's really about an understanding about where the problem occurs, and the POE has much, much to do with it.

AOS in this sense is usually utilized by couples who met or married spontaneously during a visit and even then it's not always easy going. Unless they can prove he had a return ticket, a job, a house and many more obligations to return to, I don't think any USCIS officer will buy that he came to the U.S. with his wife for a visit and just happened to decide to stay.

Respectfully, do you have a citation for this?

I actually do believe a CIS officer could buy their story (as printed here, and there is a LOT of information missing) because it does happen.

While it may be possible to do this, it is completely disregarding the visa processes we are all going through right now. If it were that simple we'd all have our spouses over on the VWP and circumvent all the necessary procedures. You're already lucky enough to be eligible for DCF. If I was in your situation I'd go back and follow that route rather than risk having the AOS denied and be out of options. Best of luck though guys.

I disagree that it's completely disregarding the visa process; I think you are reading more into the OP than was actually put there.

Now That You Are A Permanent Resident

How Do I Remove The Conditions On Permanent Residence Based On Marriage?

Welcome to the United States: A Guide For New Immigrants

Yes, even this last one.. stuff in there that not even your USC knows.....

Here are more links that I love:

Arriving in America, The POE Drill

Dual Citizenship FAQ

Other Fora I Post To:

alt.visa.us.marriage-based http://britishexpats.com/ and www.***removed***.com

censored link = *family based immigration* website

Inertia. Is that the Greek god of 'can't be bothered'?

Met, married, immigrated, naturalized.

I-130 filed Aug02

USC Jul06

No Deje Piedras Sobre El Pavimento!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's really about an understanding about where the problem occurs, and the POE has much, much to do with it.

If it was about what the officer at POE thought, no one's AOS would be rejected. Sure the "problem" of entering with the intent to immigrate may occur at POE, but the consequences are felt when AOS is denied and they have to leave the country immediately.

Respectfully, do you have a citation for this?

I actually do believe a CIS officer could buy their story (as printed here, and there is a LOT of information missing) because it does happen.

No I don't have a citation for it. I'm going based on the guides and the forums here, where adjusting status either happens from another visa or when the couple has just met. With an established relationship it gets a lot more complicated. If it was as simple as adjusting status from the VWP wouldn't we all have done that? And yes perhaps there is too much information missing for us to give them a better idea of what will happen.

I disagree that it's completely disregarding the visa process; I think you are reading more into the OP than was actually put there.

I don't think I'm reading any more into the OP than any one else. I'm not accusing them of anything. I'm sure they did come with honest intentions and just feel like staying. Unfortunately I don't hand out the green cards around here. When a negative outcome such as having to leave the country immediately is possible (and ending up with an overstay that might make reapplying quite difficult), I don't see how it could be worth the risk. They have a perfectly viable and uncomplicated option to pursue that would allow them to continue living together AND receive their visa in less time than most people. I suggest they follow that route. You can disagree if you like.

Edited by imaisha

Naturalization

N-400 package mailed: 04/16/2013

N-400 package delivered: 04/16/2013

NOA1 date: 04/17/2013

Biometrics: 08/23/2013

Interview: 10/07/2013

Oath: 01/23/2014

DONE!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
I don't think I'm reading any more into the OP than any one else. I'm not accusing them of anything. I'm sure they did come with honest intentions and just feel like staying. Unfortunately I don't hand out the green cards around here. When a negative outcome such as having to leave the country immediately is possible (and ending up with an overstay that might make reapplying quite difficult), I don't see how it could be worth the risk. They have a perfectly viable and uncomplicated option to pursue that would allow them to continue living together AND receive their visa in less time than most people. I suggest they follow that route. You can disagree if you like.

And absent the intent to immigrate at entry, there is nothing in the law that keeps them from genuinely changing their minds after they arrive.

You seem to have an interest in the topic. I'd really encourage you to expand your research if that is so, so you can understand where/when the problems actually do occur.

Now That You Are A Permanent Resident

How Do I Remove The Conditions On Permanent Residence Based On Marriage?

Welcome to the United States: A Guide For New Immigrants

Yes, even this last one.. stuff in there that not even your USC knows.....

Here are more links that I love:

Arriving in America, The POE Drill

Dual Citizenship FAQ

Other Fora I Post To:

alt.visa.us.marriage-based http://britishexpats.com/ and www.***removed***.com

censored link = *family based immigration* website

Inertia. Is that the Greek god of 'can't be bothered'?

Met, married, immigrated, naturalized.

I-130 filed Aug02

USC Jul06

No Deje Piedras Sobre El Pavimento!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...