K-1 application

[TracyTN 237]

Yes, I read what you wrote just fine, and thanks for asking in a non insulting manner.

The point I was extracting from your post was that we would have to change what we do in order to 'match' what that UK does (and the feasability therein).

Its a two way street only in the sense that each country makes it as easy as possible to visit the other without a visa. Despite being very good friends, our two countries still have different laws and the way to make those laws - hence the difference.

But there's no denying that it would be VERY nice if ours was offered as 180 days instead of 90.

I hope you can read what I wrote, too.

[KAA 0]

I read it just fine as well thank you. Your second post was more to what I was asking, I laid it out very clear on the first post. 90days vs. 180days that’s what I wrote and didn’t imply anything else, it seems that people cant wait to flame you on the most simple things asked (ie 90 vs. 180).

[TracyTN 237]

I read it just fine as well thank you. Your second post was more to what I was asking, I laid it out very clear on the first post. 90days vs. 180days that’s what I wrote and didn’t imply anything else, it seems that people cant wait to flame you on the most simple things asked (ie 90 vs. 180).

Ok dude, although I'm not sure where or how I 'flamed' you.

[Yodrak 7]

KAA,

It's not a 2-way street, it's a set of 1-way streets. The US VWP encompasses more countries than the UK and they all get the same treatment. A 90-day stay is what the US government decided was appropriate for the program.

Don't know why the UK decided on 180 days for their program of letting US citizens visit without a visa. What does the UK allow for citizens of countries other than the USA to whom it grants visa-free entry?

Yodrak

TracyTN

Did you read what I wrote? I wanted to know what people thought of US only giving them 90days and them giving us 180days.

Its a two way street and seems like we're screwing them on our end.

...