NVC Administrative Review

[babybunny 2]

AR / AP sucks.. I really dont think you have the AR/AP like what we are on ...9 months and counting..

[aussiewench 9]

Bwaadrent's NOA1 is 3/7/06. Is that right? that means their case is under IMBRA effect.

So it is interesting that their case is at NVC and not returned to CSC.

Does that mean California is processing cases of NOA1 3/6 or after?

Just wondering...........

I am going to assume here that what Bwaadrent has as the NOA1 date is the 'notice date' and not the 'received/receipt' date that one should be using. Many use/refer to the wrong date when it comes to the NOA1.

[VSSKS 0]

Aussiewench, I think you are right. Bwaadrent, may I ask your 'received date'.

thanks

[bwaaderant 0]

Aussiewench, I think you are right. Bwaadrent, may I ask your 'received date'.

thanks

My received date is 1 March, my NOA 1 date is 3 March, so I should be cool.

[aussiewench 9]

Aussiewench, I think you are right. Bwaadrent, may I ask your 'received date'.

thanks

My received date is 1 March, my NOA 1 date is 3 March, so I should be cool.

Yep, as I thought.....you fall outside of the IMBRA

What you are dealing with at NVC now with AR, many go through and nothing to do with IMBRA.

Can you edit the date for your NOA1 in your timeline to reflect the received date on your NOA1. It all helps with the stats.

Edited May 26, 2006 by aussiewench

[Larry and Maria 0]

Ok I still don't know where I stand. A former CIS employee who was an adjudicator and occasionally shows up on a Russian BBS. I asked about my case and told him both sets of dates for the NOA1 and NOA2. He claims I fall under IMBRA.

NOA1

Received 3/1/06

Notice 3/7/06

NOA2

Received 3/7/06 [why is this not 3/1? what does the change from 3/1 to 3/7 mean?]

Notice 5/8/06